Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10499397

Framework for program evaluation in public health.

Abstract

Effective program evaluation is a systematic way to improve and account for public health actions by involving procedures that are useful, feasible, ethical, and accurate. The framework guides public health professionals in their use of program evaluation. It is a practical, nonprescriptive tool, designed to summarize and organize essential elements of program evaluation. The framework comprises steps in program evaluation practice and standards for effective program evaluation. Adhering to the steps and standards of this framework will allow an understanding of each program's context and will improve how program evaluations are conceived and conducted. Furthermore, the framework encourages an approach to evaluation that is integrated with routine program operations. The emphasis is on practical, ongoing evaluation strategies that involve all program stakeholders, not just evaluation experts. Understanding and applying the elements of this framework can be a driving force for planning effective public health strategies, improving existing programs, and demonstrating the results of resource investments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1999-09-17. Framework for program evaluation in public health.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10499397/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

What is the empirical basis for paying for quality in health care?

Despite more than a decade of bench-marking and public reporting of quality problems in the health care sector, changes in medical practice have been slow to materialize. To accelerate quality improvement, many private and public payers have begun to offer financial incentives to physicians and hospitals based on their performance on clinical and service quality measures. The authors review the empirical literature on paying for quality in health care and comparable interventions in other sectors. They find little evidence to support the effectiveness of paying for quality. The absence of findings for an effect may be attributable to the small size of the bonuses studied and the fact that payers often accounted for only a fraction of the targeted provider's panel. Even in non-health settings, however, where the institutional features are more favorable to a positive impact, the literature contains mixed results on the effectiveness of analogous pay-for-performance schemes.

Program Evaluation↗

Using ethnography in the evaluation of drug prevention and intervention programs.

As more community-based substance-misuse prevention and intervention programs are funded by government and private agencies, innovative evaluation designs are required. Traditional impact or outcome evaluations based on quantitative experimental designs are not enough. Without discarding the use of statistically analyzed survey instruments, a triangulate evaluation approach centered on ethnographic fieldwork has proven successful in fulfilling this need. This paper discusses changing attitudes about ethnography in the evaluation field, describes the development and usefulness of ethnography in evaluation research, and reports on the incorporation of ethnography as part of a triangulation evaluation design as used by National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.

Program Evaluation↗