Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10488195

Comparison of agar dilution, microdilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methods for testing activity of cefditoren against Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Abstract

This study evaluated the susceptibility of pneumococci to cefditoren by agar dilution and microdilution methods (both in air) and by E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) and disk diffusion methods (both in CO(2)). By the three MIC tests, the MICs at which 50 and 90% of isolates were inhibited (MIC(50)s and MIC(90)s) were, respectively, as follows (in micrograms per milliliter): for the 65 penicillin-susceptible strains tested, 0.016 and 0.03 (by agar dilution), 0.016 and 0.03 (by microdilution), and 0.016 and 0.03 (by E test); for the 68 penicillin-intermediate strains tested, 0.125 and 0.5 (by agar dilution), 0.125 and 0.5 (by microdilution), and 0. 25 and 0.5 (by E test); and for the 67 penicillin-resistant strains tested, 1.0 and 1.0 (by agar dilution), 0.5 and 1.0 (by microdilution), and 1.0 and 1.0 (by E test). With tentative cefditoren breakpoints (in micrograms per milliliter) of </=2.0 (susceptible), 4.0 (intermediate), and >/=8.0 (resistant), all strains were susceptible to cefditoren by agar, microdilution, and E-test results; with breakpoints of </=1.0, 2.0, and >/=4.0 microg/ml, 97% of strains were cefditoren susceptible by agar dilution results, 98% were susceptible by microdilution results, and 99% were susceptible by E-test results. When microdilution and E-test results were compared to those from the reference agar dilution method, 191 (95.5%) and 183 (91.5%) of strains gave essential agreement (+/-1 log(2) dilution); 8 (2.7%) minor discrepancies were found for both methods with a breakpoint of </=1. 0 microg/ml, and no discrepancies were found with a breakpoint of </=2.0 microg/ml. Disk test results (breakpoint, </=1.0 microg/ml) produced 2 major and 30 minor errors, with corresponding zone diameters (in millimeters) of >/=20 (susceptible), 17 to 19 (intermediate), and </=16 (resistant); a </=2.0-microg/ml breakpoint yielded zone diameters of >/=16 mm (susceptible). All three methods for testing the MIC of cefditoren showed excellent correlation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L M Kelly, M R Jacobs, P C Appelbaum. 1999. Comparison of agar dilution, microdilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methods for testing activity of cefditoren against Streptococcus pneumoniae.. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.37.10.3296-3299.1999

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Efficacy of practised screening methods for detection of cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

OBJECTIVES: Enterobacteriaceae with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) are now widespread and simple phenotypic tests are required to detect them in diagnostic laboratories. We investigated the performance of screening methods at 16 hospitals in South-East England. METHODS: Sixteen laboratories in South-East England submitted 1195 consecutive Enterobacteriaceae isolates found to be resistant, by their routine methods, to any or all of cefpodoxime, ceftazidime and cefotaxime. These isolates were re-tested centrally with various cephalosporin/clavulanate combinations and with multiplex PCR for bla(CTX-M) and bla(AmpC) alleles. RESULTS: Screening methods among the laboratories were the following: cefpodoxime discs alone (1 site); cefpodoxime, cefotaxime and ceftazidime discs (9 sites) or agar dilution (1 site); Phoenix (2 sites), Vitek 1 (1 site) and Vitek 2 (2 sites). A total of 8% of isolates submitted based on disc tests proved fully cephalosporin-susceptible, compared with 3% sent based on tests with automated systems and none of those sent based on agar dilution tests. Among isolates submitted solely on cefpodoxime resistance 256/372 (69%) proved cephalosporin-susceptible or had only borderline resistance with no clear mechanism demonstrable; this proportion decreased to 28/160 (18%) for those submitted on the basis of resistance to ceftazidime, 18/122 (15%) for those resistant to cefotaxime and 26/496 (5%) for those resistant to both cefotaxime and ceftazidime. The inference of ESBL production by Vitek 2 had the best agreement with reference laboratory results. CONCLUSIONS: Many isolates found resistant only to cefpodoxime at the source sites proved not to have ESBLs or AmpC; screening with cefotaxime and ceftazidime allowed better specificity for identification of mechanism-based resistance, as did the automated systems. Cefpodoxime disc tests nevertheless remain a useful primary screen for laboratories prepared only to test one agent.

Cephalosporins↗

Survival of cephalosporin-resistant enterobacteriaceae on fingers.

Five strains of Enterobacter species (n=4) and Pantoea species (n=1) resistant to third-generation cephalosporins and isolated from clusters of 3-25 premature infants and small children and 5 strains (4 Enterobacter strains and 1 Pantoea strain) with the same resistance pattern that were isolated from 1 premature infant or small child each were inoculated on the fingertips of 10 volunteer study participants to test whether survival on fingertips is correlated with horizontal transmission. Although there was no significant difference in survival between the groups of transmitted and sporadic strains, there were significant differences in bacterial survival between the participants.

Cephalosporins↗