Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1047837

Abnormal uterine bleeding.

Abstract

The management of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding requires a logical, rational approach, and an awareness of etiologic factors. A careful history and examination should attempt to answer these questions: (1) Is the bleeding truly from the uterus? (2) Is the bleeding superimposed upon ovulatory cycles or (3) is the bleeding anovulatory? The endometrial biopsy obtained during the bleeding episode, and the basal temperature chart are diagnostically useful. Massive uterine bleeding not due to a complication of pregnancy, neoplasis, or blood dyscrasia, usually responds immediately to curettage, done in operating room or office; follow-up hormonal therapy with progesterone and a progestational agent should control the episode. More chronic forms of abnormal uterine bleeding are approached by identifying and treating the etiologic cause. If the cause is not correctable (e.g., obesity), most patients will respond satisfactorily to the cyclic administration of a progestational agent, or, if indicated, to induction of ovulation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A C Wentz. 1976. Abnormal uterine bleeding.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1047837/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of hysteroscopic and hysterectomy findings for assessing the diagnostic accuracy of office hysteroscopy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of office hysteroscopy by comparing the hysteroscopic findings with the histologic findings on the hysterectomy specimens. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENT(S): Review of the hospital records of 443 patients who underwent office hysteroscopy and, within 2 months, hysterectomy. INTERVENTION(S): We compared the hysteroscopic findings (including targeted biopsies) with the histologic findings that were obtained after hysterectomy. The results of this study were then compared with those of a previous study in which we examined the diagnostic accuracy of dilatation and curettage (D&C). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of office hysteroscopy. RESULT(S): When compared with the histologic diagnosis of the uterus, the hysteroscopic findings showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 98%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 96%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98%. Hysteroscopy was found to have a greater diagnostic accuracy than D&C: the sensitivity and the NPV of the two diagnostic procedures were statistically different. CONCLUSION(S): Office hysteroscopy is confirmed as a powerful diagnostic tool, but targeted biopsies, performed with a small diameter operative hysteroscope, must be performed in cases of suspect endometrium to confirm the image-based diagnosis.

Dilatation and Curettage↗