Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10477379

[Surrogate endpoints].

Abstract

The main endpoint of a phase III trial in oncology must be relevant clinically. In practice, this endpoint is either the disease-free or the overall survival, which requires both long term follow-up and a large number of patients. In phase II trials, it is essential to proceed rapidly, and one therefore uses a surrogate endpoint. Surrogate endpoints are adequate for phase II trials. Their use for phase III trials should be restricted to the rare situations where their validity has been established for the therapeutic and a under study. This surrogate endpoint must be faster to obtain than the clinical endpoint it replaces. Ideally, it should capture all of the treatment effect on the main endpoint, i.e. there should be no effect of the treatment on survival, once the value of the surrogate endpoint is known.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Hill. [Surrogate endpoints].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10477379/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An improved method of evaluating drug effect in a multiple dose clinical trial.

In drug development, finding an optimal dose is normally carried out in a phase II trial. A phase III trial will then be conducted to demonstrate that the selected dose is efficacious and safe. As choosing a dose from the phase II trial which has the highest observed response rate could overestimate the true response rate of the selected dose, the data from the phase II study cannot be simply pooled with the data from the phase III study in a final analysis. Therefore, a solution to the overestimation problem needs to be found so that the information obtained from phase II dose finding clinical trials can appropriately be combined with the data in the phase III study. In this paper, the potential overestimation in a multiple dose clinical trial is assessed and a method for correcting this bias is proposed. Simulations show that stepwise over-correction, the proposed method, is better than methods such as Bonferroni's procedure.

Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic↗

Application of a new multinomial phase II stopping rule using response and early progression.

PURPOSE: A multinomial stopping rule had previously been developed that incorporated both objective response and early progression into decisions to stop or continue phase II trials of anticancer agents. The purpose of this study was to apply the multinomial rule to two independent sets of phase II data to assess its utility in appropriately recommending early trial closure as compared with other stopping rules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from completed phase II trials of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group (ECSG) formed the basis of the study. Based on observed results for each trial, the recommendation of the multinomial stopping rule was applied, as was the recommendation of the actual stopping rule used (Fleming or Gehan). The appropriateness of the recommendations was evaluated based on interpretation of final study results. RESULTS: The standard and multinomial rules disagreed on early stopping in one of 16 NCIC CTG trials and in seven of 23 ECSG trials. In all cases, the standard rule advised continuing to the second stage whereas the multinomial rule advised stopping early because of excessive numbers of patients experiencing early disease progression. Final trial results indicated that the multinomial recommendation was appropriate, because in no study did final results lead to conclusions of activity. CONCLUSION: In this series of trials, the multinomial stopping rule performed more efficiently than the Fleming or Gehan rules in advising early stopping of trials. These results encourage continued exploration of this approach for phase II trials of cytotoxic and noncytotoxic anticancer agents.

Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic↗