Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10475395

Using database information in your clinical practice.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical database information is in wide demand, but it is not always used to its full potential. Clinicians must learn to be the experts and to assert leadership in the use of their own data. METHODS: Clinical databases provide unique perspectives on the full process of care for a heterogeneous population of patients. They focus beyond individual providers, to their interaction within a complex system of care. Exploring questions that arise from this data can identify system issues, which are invisible to individual practitioners or specialties using other traditional review methods. RESULTS: Clinical database information helped our hospital staff identify problems in their approach to a small subset of high risk coronary bypass patients. Multiple system changes resulted in a dramatic reduction in mortality. Collateral impact on all care reduced overall mortality from 4.5% to below 2%. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest opportunities for improvement in patient care often lie in the areas where specialties or teams interface, eg, in overlapping or transferring care. The whole system of care for each patient must be optimized, not just the individual specialty components. Clinical database information provides a way to evaluate and improve the overall process and results of the broader system of patient care.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S W Dziuban. 1999. Using database information in your clinical practice.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00504-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Invited commentary.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

Current trends in coronary artery disease in women.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are some striking sex differences regarding presentation, symptoms and sign, diagnosis, and treatment of coronary artery disease. Historically, healthcare delivery to women has been plagued with treatment bias favoring men. This review will present relevant cardiovascular physiologic sex differences, current treatment options for coronary artery disease both surgical and medical, and clinical outcomes of such treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: In the past, pharmacologic and interventional studies generally excluded women from their subjects. As a result, women have been traditionally treated based on the findings in their male counterparts. Recent studies examining sex differences in the treatment of coronary artery disease have given new insight into the hormonal and behavioral influences associated with coronary artery disease. Finally, these studies have drawn attention to possibly inadvertent discrepancies in the way men and women are treated for coronary artery disease. SUMMARY: Despite significant advances in medical and surgical approaches to treat coronary artery disease, it remains and will continue to be the most important healthcare challenge of the 21st century. Whereas efforts are underway to encourage inclusion of more women in therapeutic trials, the educational process, particularly in medical school, needs to broadly address sex specific pathophysiology and treatment, rather than relying on sub-subspecialty training for optimizing healthcare delivery in women.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗