Branch length heterogeneity leads to nonindependent branch length estimates and can decrease the efficiency of methods of phylogenetic inference.

Abstract

Branch length estimates play a central role in maximum-likelihood (ML) and minimum-evolution (ME) methods of phylogenetic inference. For various reasons, branch length estimates are not statistically independent under ML or ME. We studied the response of correlations among branch length estimates to the degree of among-branch length heterogeneity (BLH) in the model (true) tree. The frequency and magnitude of (especially negative) correlations among branch length estimates were both shown to increase as BLH increases under simulation and analytically. For ML, we used the correct model (Jukes-Cantor). For ME, we employed ordinary least-squares (OLS) branch lengths estimated under both simple p-distances and Jukes-Cantor distances, analyzed with and without an among-site rate heterogeneity parameter. The efficiency of ME and ML was also shown to decrease in response to increased BLH. We note that the shape of the true tree will in part determine BLH and represents a critical factor in the probability of recovering the correct topology. An important finding suggests that researchers cannot expect that different branches that were in fact the same length will have the same probability of being accurately reconstructed when BLH exists in the overall tree. We conclude that methods designed to minimize the interdependencies of branch length estimates (BLEs) may (1) reduce both the variance and the covariance associated with the estimates and (2) increase the efficiency of model-based optimality criteria. We speculate on possible ways to reduce the nonindependence of BLEs under OLS and ML.