PubMed · 10410121
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L Hall. 1999. Medication compliance.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10410121/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Within the past few years encouraging progress has been made in the treatment of HIV-1 infection, largely due to the combined use of HIV-1 protease inhibitors with nucleoside and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Despite this, HIV-1 infection is still a major global problem and the emergence of a drug resistant virus is ever present. There is a continuing need to develop new therapeutic strategies as well as improve upon all forms of existing therapies for the treatment of this viral infection. It has now been almost a decade since the first demonstration that ribozymes can effectively inhibit HIV-1 infectious spread in cell culture. Since then, ribozymes have progressed into human clinical trials primarily through gene therapy approaches. This progression brings ribozymes into the forefront as an important addition to the growing arsenal of anti-HIV-1 weapons. The following review covers the developments in anti-HIV-1 ribozyme usage over the past decade and summarizes the current state of ribozyme development for the purpose of inhibiting HIV-1 infection.
We designed a cohort in order to assess the long-term effects of triple-drug antiretroviral combinations in 608 patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We recruited patients who had been previously treated with nucleoside analogues as well as treatment-naive patients who were starting triple-drug antiretroviral combinations consisting of nucleoside analogues, either alone or in combination with a protease inhibitor. After a median follow-up time of 22 months, the incidence rates of acquired immune deficiency syndrome-defining events and death were, respectively, 6.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3-8.8) and 2.9 (95% CI, 1.9-4.2) per 100 person-years. Advanced clinical stage of disease (P=.004), a low CD4(+) cell count (P=.002), and a low quality-of-life score (P=.001) at baseline were independent predictors of clinical progression. The initial triple-drug combination was modified a total of 647 times in 321 patients. The only independent predictor of treatment modification was previous exposure to a nucleoside analogue in patients who did not receive a new nucleoside analogue at inclusion (P=.001). Plasma HIV RNA values below 500 copies/mL were obtained in 88% of the treatment-naive patients and in 57% of the previously treated patients (P<.001). Compared with previously treated patients who received > or = 1 new nucleoside analogue at enrollment, previously treated patients who did not receive a new nucleoside analogue at enrollment were twice as likely to have plasma HIV RNA values >500 copies/mL at the last visit (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.8), and the antiretroviral-naive patients were significantly less likely to have plasma HIV RNA values >500 copies/mL at the last visit (adjusted OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.4).
We have determined the sequence of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vif genes from a cohort of 42 long-term nonprogressors (LTNP) and compared these sequences to those of 8 late progressors. The coding potential of the vif open reading frame directly derived by nested PCR from uncultured peripheral blood mononuclear cell DNA was conserved in all 50 individuals. The nucleotide distances between vif sequences were not significantly different between LTNP and late progressors, indicating similar selections of viruses within both types of long-term HIV-1-infected subjects. However, a statistically significant correlation between an amino acid signature at position 132 of Vif and the viral load was found within LTNP. Namely, amino acid Ser was associated with low viral load and amino acid Arg with high viral load. This signature was also observed when LTNP with low viral load were compared to progressors. The Ser132 signature was introduced in place of Arg132 present in the HIV-1 YU-2 Vif prototype into chimeric viruses to assess the impact of Vif signature on the virus. While the replication properties in the SupT1 cell line were unmodified, the mutagenized virus revealed a fivefold decreased replication in activated PBMC, suggesting a possible role of this Vif signature for viral production in vivo.