Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10407713

Precept-Assist. a computerized, data-based evaluation system.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traditional methods of resident evaluation have several limitations, including recall bias and memory decay. We developed a real-time, computerized, data-based evaluation system and determined 1) the feasibility of using such a system in an ambulatory care teaching center and 2) the types of evaluation data such a computer-based evaluation system provides to residency directors, faculty, and residents. METHODS: We developed Precept-Assist, a computerized, data-based evaluation system. Reports from the system provide quantitative data, summative reports, and qualitative comments regarding specific competencies of residents. Following each precepting encounter between a faculty member and a resident, the faculty member entered into the system an array of coded information on the resident's level of performance, competencies achieved, and procedural skills. RESULTS: We have entered more than 15,000 pieces of evaluative data on 4,504 precepting encounters. The average time to enter data was about 40 seconds per encounter. Reports were generated to monitor each resident's progress through the program. The information was used to generate learning plans tailored to each resident's needs. CONCLUSIONS: Precept-Assist was useful for evaluating the performance of residents in this study.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A DiTomasso, J D Gamble, M A Willard. 1999. Precept-Assist. a computerized, data-based evaluation system.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10407713/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The UICC Telepathology Consultation Center. International Union Against Cancer. A global approach to improving consultation for pathologists in cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The morphologic diagnosis of tumor specimens with precise tumor typing, staging, and grading remains the basis of almost all cancer treatments. Thus, in each tumor case, a histologic diagnosis of the highest quality should be the physician's priority. In approximately 10-20% of tumor cases, diagnostic uncertainty remains to some degree, requiring a second opinion in determining the biologic behavior, the histogenesis, the grade of dedifferentiation, or any other parameter. Facilitating the communication between pathologists and the exchange of cases, telepathology gains more and more importance. To benefit from this technical development, the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) has decided to establish a Telepathology Consultation Center (UICC-TPCC) for interested pathologists around the world. METHODS: The communication and exchange of histologic images works via the Internet. To ensure constant documentation, a case-based data base and image archive is used. Special TPCC software handles all requests to the TPCC and controls the interaction among requesting pathologists, TPCC, and UICC experts (transferring, reading, answering, logging, storing, etc.). All necessary data for controlling the telepathology service are stored in a customized SQL data base. The necessary equipment for the requesting pathologist is a personal computer; a digital or television camera/frame grabber, which is attached to a microscope; and access to the Internet. The requesting party contacts the TPCC's World Wide Web server and uploads the images and the clinical data of their case. To ensure uninterrupted functioning, the hardware will be part of a high-level communication center, which is connected via ATM (asynchronous transfer mode, 155 megabits per second) to the Internet. RESULTS: The UICC has decided to establish the TPCC at the Institute of Pathology at the Charité, Humboldt-University, Berlin, Germany. The TPCC will not make the diagnoses itself but will involve an affiliated specialized expert pathologist. He or she will be on the panel of UICC experts who will constitute the "diagnostic backbone" of the TPCC. The center will function as follows: If a pathologist anywhere on the globe is confronted with the diagnosis of a difficult tumor case, he takes digitized histologic images (5-40 in number) and sends them along with sufficient clinical data to the server of the UICC-TPCC, asking for a second opinion. The center checks the case and transfers it to one of the UICC experts. This expert makes his or her diagnostic suggestion, which is then transferred back to the requesting pathologist via the UICC-TPCC. CONCLUSIONS: The UICC-TPCC will be able to provide rapid and inexpensive diagnostic aid to pathologists all over the world, offering the possibility of a second opinion in accordance with the UICC-TNM and World Health Organization (WHO) standards. During the first and second year, the UICC-TPCC will be financed by sponsors. Telepathology makes the distribution of new developments of diagnostic standards, e.g., of the TNM system, WHO terminology, new tumor classifications, and updated information on actual technologies, globally accessible in a direct and rapid way. It also enables a high quality of education and teaching.

Computers↗