Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10384573

Measuring and improving quality using information systems.

Abstract

Information systems (IS) are increasingly important for measuring and improving quality. In this paper, we describe our integrated delivery system's plan for and experiences with measuring and improving quality using IS. Our approach is that for quality measurement to be practical, it must be integrated with the routine provision of care, and whenever possible should be done using IS. Thus, at one hospital, we now perform almost all quality measurement using IS. However, IS are not only useful for measuring care, but represent powerful tools for improving care using decision support. Specific areas in which IS has already been particularly effective include reducing the unnecessary use of laboratory testing, reporting important abnormalities to key providers rapidly, adverse drug event detection and prevention, initiatives to reduce the costs of drugs, and making critical pathways available to providers. The next wave of effort will be to promote widespread use of computerized guidelines, which is likely to prove more challenging. However, the advent of managed care in the U.S. has produced strong incentives to provide high quality care at low cost, and our perspective is that only with better IS than exist today will this be possible on a widespread basis. Such systems make feasible implementation of care improvement and cost reduction initiatives on a scale which could not previously be considered.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D W Bates, E M Pappius, G J Kuperman, D Sittig, H Burstin, D Fairchild, T A Brennan, J M Teich. 1998. Measuring and improving quality using information systems.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10384573/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support.

This document comprises an AMIA Board of Directors approved White Paper that presents a roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. It is published in JAMIA for archival and dissemination purposes. The full text of this material has been previously published on the AMIA Web site (www.amia.org/inside/initiatives/cds). AMIA is the copyright holder.

Decision Making, Computer-Assisted↗

Viewpoint: controversies surrounding use of order sets for clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry.

Order sets provide straightforward clinical decision support within computerized provider order entry systems. They make "the right thing" easier to do because they are much faster than writing single orders; they deliver real-time, evidence-based prompts; they are easy to update; and they support coverage of multiple patient problems through linkages among order sets. This viewpoint paper discusses controversies surrounding use of order sets--advantages and pitfalls, decision-making criteria, and organizational considerations, including suggestions for vendors. Order sets have the potential to improve clinician efficiency, provide real-time guidance, facilitate compliance with Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services performance measure sets, and encourage overall acceptance of computerized provider order entry, but may not do so unless these controversies are addressed.

Decision Making, Computer-Assisted↗

VisualDx: decision-support software for the diagnosis and management of dermatologic disorders.

The VisualDx system (http://www.logicalimages.com/prodVDx.htm) is a JAVA-based decision-support program developed by Logical Images to be used in clinical care to develop differential diagnoses based upon morphologic finding- and patient finding-driven searching. It consists of several modules, many of which are very relevant to infectious diseases specialists, such as Fever & Rash; International Travel; Drug Eruptions; Smallpox Vaccination; Terrorism Recognition; Immunocompromised, HIV or AIDS; Female Genital Rashes & Growths; and Male Genital Rashes & Growths. Unlike books and atlases indexed by disease, with VisualDx, clinicians can enter patient descriptors and lesion morphologies, resulting in rapid assistance with differential diagnosis. VisualDx also increases clinician awareness of, knowledge about, and skills in the recognition of chemical warfare, bioterrorism, and radiation injuries.

Decision Making, Computer-Assisted↗