Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10384487

Self-documenting structured reports using open information standards.

C E Kahn
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Structured reporting systems use standardized data elements and predetermined data-entry formats to record observations. This article describes a system for structured data entry and reporting that generates reports encoded in the Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML), an open, internationally accepted standard for document interchange. The structured report is self-documenting: it includes a definition of its allowable data field and values encoded as a report-specific SGML document type definition (DTD). By linking its reporting concepts with those of external vocabularies such as the UMLS Metathesaurus, this system can create open, universally comprehensible structured reports.

Explore related subjects

Data DisplayDocumentationHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedProgramming LanguagesUser-Computer InterfaceJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C E Kahn. 1998. Self-documenting structured reports using open information standards.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10384487/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Determining the sharpness of electronic image displays: an evaluation of three methods.

The authors evaluated 3 methods developed to assess the level of monitor cathode ray tube (CRT) sharpness. Results include a comparison of 2 observer-based methods to a charged coupled device (CCD) digital camera-based method for the purposes of CRT equipment comparison, acceptance testing, and routine CRT quality control. Three methods designed to measure a monitor's sharpness were evaluated on a single 20-inch CRT monitor. We defined signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to be the overall signal difference measured by each method from the highest to lowest values divided by the average standard deviation of the measurements. Comparing the results of the 3 methods, the authors found that the digital CCD camera-based method provided a much higher SNR than the 2 observer-based methods and, therefore, is the preferred of the 3 methods for measuring the sharpness of CRT displays. The SNR values for the CCD, Cx and line target methods were 151.5, 4.9, and 4.3, respectively. The Cx target observer-based method (a novel target and scoring routine dubbed the "Cx" target because of its appearance) had a higher SNR than the line target observer-based method. The average time and standard deviation required to score the Cx and the line targets were 5.45 +/- 2.15 minutes and 8.34 +/- 2.95 minutes, respectively. The observer-based method results (and variability) versus the camera-based method results (and variability) indicate strong linear relationships. Exploring this finding and the optimization of the camera-based method are the subjects of future research.

Data Display↗