Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10382831

Best practice--ongoing polemics.

Abstract

Current treatment strategies and disease management programs for hyperlipidemia employ a range of lipid-lowering drugs. Results from early lipid-lowering trials using diet, fibrates, niacin and other classes of drug showed that lowering plasma cholesterol can significantly reduce the risk of developing ischemic cardiovascular events. The landmark statin trials have clearly demonstrated the benefits of lipid-lowering therapy in coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention and unlike early lipid-lowering studies, a reduction in mortality may become evident with statin therapy during the first year of treatment. The number of successful lipid-intervention trials continues to increase and evidence is accumulating that lipid modification can also reduce the risk of cardiovascular events among individuals with only modest degrees of blood-lipid abnormalities. With increasingly powerful drugs to modify blood lipids, the potential levels at which to initiate treatment and the appropriate target levels are rapidly changing and debate surrounds the question of where the line to initiate treatment should be drawn. The relative lack of major adverse events with statin therapy means that the level of CHD risk at which clinical benefit occurs cannot be determined by the degree of risk at which benefit exceeds adverse events. Therefore, patients with only moderately raised cholesterol levels can be treated because statin treatment is well tolerated. One of the most important aspects of the statin trials is the finding that clinical events, such as death and disability due to coronary artery disease, may be preventable or limited in a significant number of patients if they receive aggressive therapy. Current goals for cholesterol levels in patients with established CHD are rarely achieved with non-aggressive treatment; however, with aggressive lipid lowering statins can achieve these goals in a safe and effective manner.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Paoletti, S Bellosta. 1999. Best practice--ongoing polemics.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9150(99)00100-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The glomerular filtration rate in an apparently healthy population and its relation with cardiovascular mortality during 10 years.

AIMS: Moderate-to-severe chronic renal failure is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. However, most studies have been performed in selected populations and the impact of very small decrements of renal function on long-term cardiac morbidity and mortality has not yet been established. Also, the cut-off level of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from which cardiovascular risk increases has not exactly been established. This study wants to address these questions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten year follow-up of a representative population-based cohort comprised 8913 randomly selected, apparently healthy participants. Participants were randomly drawn from Belgian voting lists. Cardiovascular risk factors were noted. Serum creatinine values were corrected to isotope dilution mass spectrometry standard, and GFR was calculated using the recently modified 'modification of diet in renal disease' equation. Participants were followed for 10 years, and cause-specific death was registered by analysis of death certificates. The probability to die from all causes or from cardiovascular causes during the 10 year follow-up period increased in each quartile of GFR, even after correction for different other comorbid conditions. CONCLUSION: Even mild renal failure is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular mortality within 10 years in an apparently healthy unselected population. This detrimental effect starts already at a relatively high GFR of 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and remains present after correction for other established cardiovascular risk factors.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

Quality physical intervention activity for persons with Down syndrome.

Persons with Down syndrome (DS) are at risk for a life of inactivity that can result in a multitude of medical problems including heart and vascular diseases. This review presents findings regarding the physical status of individuals with DS, as well as proper interventions found to improve the physical fitness and general health for this population. This review was written with the intent to suggest practical directions in planning and implementing quality physical intervention programs for this population.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗