Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10382410

Defensible documentation using the endoscopy pathway.

P Anderson·J L Rodlund
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Complete, defensible documentation in a busy endoscopy unit can be elusive. Quick turnaround time, impatient physicians, and add-on and emergent cases all contribute to chaotic days. The endoscopy pathway provides a guided path for succinct documentation by the healthcare worker. A scoring system is initiated on admission. Assessment parameters clearly define scores for vital signs, level of consciousness, abdominal status, pain, safety, and mobility. Scores can be scanned quickly and compared by the nurse to identify significant changes in each patient. Documentation is timely, communicative, and complete. The endoscopy pathway is illustrated by a case study. It reflects patients' progress throughout their stay in the GI unit from admission to discharge. The implementation process of this innovative chart form is presented.

Explore related subjects

Critical PathwaysDocumentationEducation, Nursing, ContinuingEndoscopyForms and Records ControlHumansInservice TrainingJoint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare OrganizationsNursing AssessmentNursing RecordsNursing Staff, HospitalPatient AdmissionPatient DischargeTotal Quality ManagementJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Anderson, J L Rodlund. Defensible documentation using the endoscopy pathway.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001610-199903000-00002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Clinical management. Design for living.

91 per cent of patients started treatment within two mounths of referral, compared to 70-80 per cent last year. The last five months has seen rapid progress at a rate of 2 per cent a month. Sustaining improvement depends on leadership, measurement and looking at the whole patient pathway.

Critical Pathways↗
PubMed2006

[Clinical pathways -- first results of a systematic IT-supported application at a surgical department of a university hospital].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In analogy to industrial process management, clinical pathways have been introduced for operational process organisation in orthopedic and interventional procedures as well as for conservative treatments. Within this study, introduction and continuous, systematic application of clinical pathways at a surgical department of a university hospital was investigated. METHODS: Analysis was performed by IT-based (SAP/i. s. h.med) evaluation of the registered data regarding pathway violations. Additionally, patients' records were matched with the computerized data for quality assurance of pathway documentation. RESULTS: 501 patients were entered in 16 clinical pathways (31 +/- 39 patients per pathway). The mean period from the introduction of a distinct pathway to the data acquisition of the present study ranged from 2 to 14 months (mean 7+/-7.5 months). Pathway violations correlated with the complexity, but not with the period since the pathway was introduced. Organisational reasons next to medical reasons (i. e. delayed gastric function or wound healing) were the most frequent causes for pathway violations. CONCLUSION: Clinical pathways may not only be realised for operative procedures or conservative treatments, but represent a clinical and administrative management instrument at a surgical department of a university hospital for daily work routine. They are suitable as an instrument for clinical quality and risk management, as an economic control instrument in reorganisation phases as well as in the routine of surgical clinics.

Critical Pathways↗