PubMed · 10378214
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
G Fitzmaurice. 1999. Confidence intervals.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-9007(99)00063-5
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Lipoprotein(a) is composed of low-density lipoprotein linked both covalently and noncovalently to apolipoprotein(a). The structure of lipoprotein(a) and the interactions between low-density lipoprotein and apolipoprotein(a) were investigated by electron microscopy and correlated with analytical ultracentrifugation. Electron microscopy of rotary-shadowed and unidirectionally shadowed lipoprotein(a) prepared without glycerol revealed that it is a nearly spherical particle with no large projections. After extraction of both lipoprotein(a) and low-density lipoprotein with glycerol prior to rotary shadowing, the protein components were observed to consist of a ring of density made up of nodules of different sizes, with apolipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein B-100 closely associated with each other. However, when lipoprotein(a) was treated with a lysine analogue, 6-aminohexanoic acid, much of the apolipoprotein(a) separated from the apolipoprotein B-100. In 6-aminohexanoic acid-treated preparations without glycerol extraction, lipoprotein(a) particles had an irregular mass of density around the core. In contrast, lipoprotein(a) particles treated with 6-aminohexanoic acid in the presence of glycerol had a long tail, in which individual kringles could be distinguished, extending from the ring of apolipoprotein B-100. The length of the tail was dependent on the particular isoform of apolipoprotein(a). Dissociation of the noncovalent interactions between apolipoprotein(a) and low-density lipoprotein as a result of shear forces or changes in the microenvironment may contribute to selective retention of lipoprotein(a) in the vasculature.
Quality management and improvement are increasingly important to managed care organizations (MCOs) as competition increases. One key area on which quality improvement programs can focus is MCO activity in helping patients remain healthy. Screening for and treatment of hyperlipidemia are important components of the preventive care of patients who are at risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). This article summarizes the methodology of a three-phase hyperlipidemia outcomes management program being implemented by 27 US health plans. Phase 1 identifies inefficiencies in the clinical management of hyperlipidemia by assessing patients' attainment rates of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets. This information is then used to develop a multifactorial intervention program for CHD prevention in phase 2. The interventions for physicians include provision of treatment algorithms for patients with varying degrees of hyperlipidemia, education programs encouraging appropriate treatment of hyperlipidemia, and academic detailing summarizing phase 1 results and providing applicable literature. In phase 3, patient records are reassessed at least 6 months after the educational intervention. This three-phase program has the potential to improve patient care, reduce unnecessary treatment costs, provide a means of quality improvement, and increase plan value to potential purchasers.