Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10344945

Performance indicators in NHS libraries.

Abstract

Performance indicators (PIs), workload statistics and accreditation are different ways to assess the quality of a library information service (LIS), and can be used together to give an overall picture of how well a LIS is performing its functions. PIs point out how something has been done. They are comparative values, often expressed partly as ratios or percentages, which indicate the quality or level of services and can be used to compare similar services, or the same service across time. PIs, performance ratios or performance standards are derived from performance measures, which show how much of it has been done. This paper looks at some aspects of performance measurement and suggests other areas for statistics collection in order to make better use of existing data, and considers the usefulness and derivation of PIs in NHS LIS.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Hewlett. 1998. Performance indicators in NHS libraries.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2532.1998.1540245.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Management systems of the quality of health care in Quebec hospitals].

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to take stock of the development of quality management systems in the Quebec health care services. METHODS: The study relied on semi-guided interviews and on a documentary analysis. It concerned the structure and the activity of quality management in 4 Montreal university hospitals as well as on outside organizations dealing with quality of care. RESULTS: Quality management of the health care services is dealt with by council on health care accreditation and regional health and social services agencies. In hospitals, the quality of services is managed by structures created by the administration council and the top management: the piloting committee, the head of quality assurance, the executive committees and the multidisciplinary team or self-evaluation of the hospital, and development of plans for improvement. Other activities are management of complaints, users satisfaction evaluation and follow-up of indicators. CONCLUSIONS: This system of quality management of services is currently expanding. This change of paradigm leads to accepting the view of services users and to change quality management methods. Those methods have evolved from normative approach to a continuous quality improvement approach.

Consumer Behavior↗