Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10343480

Planned change to implement a restraint reduction program.

Abstract

Physical restraints have been the standard of practice to manage certain types of patient behavior, such as unstable mobility, wandering, agitation, and interference with medical treatment. However, this intervention is not without serious negative consequences. Patients with neurological disorders or injuries are often at high risk for being restrained. The need to change to a more positive, patient-focused, restraint-free model was the goal of this project. A convenience sample of adult patients who were admitted to a neurological unit were studied. Outcome data that were assessed included (1) staff nurses' perception of restraints, (2) fall rate, (3) fall rate with injury, and (4) tube/line loss rate. Staff perceptions of restraints were assessed by administering the Perception of Restraints Use Questionnaire (PRUQ) before and after implementation of the restraint-reduced environment. The results of the outcome data support the change to a more restraint-reduced environment, as indicated by fall rate, fall rate with injury, and tube/line loss. Additionally, nurses' perceptions of restraints, as measured by the PRUQ, indicated a trend toward less emphasis on the use of restraints to control specific unsafe or undesirable patient behaviors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Gilbert, C Counsell. 1999. Planned change to implement a restraint reduction program.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001786-199906000-00007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A population-based study of potential brain injuries requiring emergency care.

BACKGROUND: Brain injury is an important health concern, yet there are few population-based analyses on which to base prevention initiatives. This study aimed, first, to calculate rates of potential brain injury within a defined Canadian population and, second, to describe the external causes, natures and disposition from the emergency department of these injuries. METHODS: We studied all cases of blunt head injury that resulted in a visit to an emergency department for all residents of Greater Kingston during 1998. We used data from the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP) and augmented this by examining all records of emergency or inpatient care received at all hospitals in the area. RESULTS: In 202 (27%) of 760 cases of head injury, there was potential for brain injury. Annual rates of potential brain injury were 16 and 7 per 10,000 population for males and females respectively. CT was performed on 114 (56%) of 202 cases, of which 60 (53%) demonstrated an intracranial pathology, with 11 (10%) showing a diffuse axonal injury pattern on the initial scan. Falls from heights accounted for 14 (47%) of 30 injuries observed in children aged 0-9 years. Individuals aged 10-44 years sustained 32 (63%) of 51 motor vehicle injuries, 15 (88%) of 17 bicycle injuries, 22 (100%) of 22 sports injuries and 8 (89%) of 9 fight-related injuries. Falls accounted for 15 (71%) of 21 injuries among adults aged 65 years or more. INTERPRETATION: The results indicate the relative importance of several external causes of injury. The findings from our geographically distinct population are useful in establishing rational priorities for the prevention of brain injury.

Accidental Falls↗