Robin sequences and complexes: causal heterogeneity and pathogenetic/phenotypic variability.

M M Cohen

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10340643

Robin sequences and complexes: causal heterogeneity and pathogenetic/phenotypic variability.

M M Cohen

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Robin sequence has been the subject of numerous general papers and has also been cited in specific syndrome articles. Evidence is provided that the condition is not only causally heterogeneous but also pathogenetically and phenotypically variable, necessitating the use of the terms "Robin sequences" and "Robin complexes."

Explore related subjects

Genetic Heterogeneity Humans Mandible Phenotype Pierre Robin Syndrome Editorial

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

M M Cohen. 1999-06-04. Robin sequences and complexes: causal heterogeneity and pathogenetic/phenotypic variability.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10340643/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Nested, non-parametric, correlative analysis of microarrays for heterogenous phenotype characterization.

We present a non-parametric approach for qualitatively selecting candidate genes to characterize several criteria that are nested among genes selected on the basis of their individual, similar effects upon an array-wide closeness measure. In this setting, a goal is to obtain a reliable characterization of phenotypes, based on very high-dimensional data from a few samples. As opposed to a distance-based approach, the proposed measure defines closeness based on gene signal profiles (functionals) rather than on isolated (numerical) differences in each gene between samples. By using such a measure to characterize intensity differences, we effectively separate biological from artifactual variation in expression, due to tissue effects or signal calibration. Based on this measure, we successively examine the significance of the following: a set of similarly behaved genes relative to all arrayed genes, a set of candidate genes relative to similarly behaved genes, individual candidate genes relative to non-candidates, and the direction, as over- or under-expressed, of candidate genes. In each setting, sample pairs are the units of analysis, with U-statistics the theoretical framework. We illustrate the method on a microarray experiment, where the goal is to select sets of genes that characterize a type of skin cancer and its histological subtypes.

Genetic Heterogeneity↗

PubMed2006

Subtyping schizophrenia: implications for genetic research.

Phenotypic variability and likely extensive genetic heterogeneity have been confounding the search for the causes of schizophrenia since the inception of the diagnostic category. The inconsistent results of genetic linkage and association studies using the diagnostic category as the sole schizophrenia phenotype suggest that the current broad concept of schizophrenia does not demarcate a homogeneous disease entity. Approaches involving subtyping and stratification by covariates to reduce heterogeneity have been successful in the genetic study of other complex disorders, but rarely applied in schizophrenia research. This article reviews past and present attempts at delineating schizophrenia subtypes based on clinical features, statistically derived measures, putative genetic indicators, and intermediate phenotypes, highlighting the potential utility of multidomain neurocognitive endophenotypes.

Genetic Heterogeneity↗

PubMed2006

Testing for genetic heterogeneity in the genome search meta-analysis method.

The Genome Search Meta-Analysis (GSMA) method is widely used to detect linkage by pooling results of previously published genome-wide linkage studies. The GSMA uses a non-parametric summed rank statistic in 30 cM bins of the genome. Zintzaras and Ioannidis ([2005] Genet. Epidemiol. 28:123-137) developed a method of testing for heterogeneity of evidence for linkage in the GSMA, with three heterogeneity statistics (Q, Ha, B). They implement two testing procedures, restricted versus unrestricted for the summed rank within the bin. We show here that the rank-unrestricted test provides a conservative test for high heterogeneity and liberal test for low heterogeneity in linked regions. The rank-restricted test should therefore be used, despite the extensive simulations needed. In a simulation study, we show that the power to detect heterogeneity is low. For 20 studies of affected sib pairs, simulated assuming linkage in all studies to a gene with sibling relative risk of 1.3, the power to detect low heterogeneity using the Q statistic was 14%. With linkage present in 50% of the studies (to a gene with sibling relative risk of 1.4), the Q heterogeneity statistic had power of 29% to detect high heterogeneity. The power to detect linkage using the summed rank was high in both of these situations, at 98% and 79%, respectively. Although testing for heterogeneity in the GSMA is of interest, the currently available method provides little additional information to that provided by the summed rank statistic.

Genetic Heterogeneity↗