Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10317512

Introducing guidelines into clinical practice.

Abstract

The impetus for guidelines of practice has been accelerated by a worldwide trend towards insurance based systems of health care. In the past it has been the tradition for the clinician to order all the diagnostic procedures that conceivably might help to clarify what is wrong with a patient, or what course of treatment should be followed. This traditional view ignores the stubborn economic reality that resources are finite and that it is no longer possible to be both endlessly generous and continually fair. Making judgements about the need for, and value of, services now forms an important part of coping with this problem. Clinical practice has to strive to be as safe as possible and to produce a given benefit at a socially acceptable cost. Guidelines are recommendations, preferably developed by clinicians themselves, which describe how and when individual clinical activities should be offered in order to achieve these objectives. Utilisation review of current practice is a valuable source of information for the development of guidelines. In the United Kingdom the Royal College of Radiologists attempted to do this in connection with the use of pre-operative chest X-rays. In 1979 they published the findings of a multicentre review of 10,619 consecutive cases of elective non-cardiopulmonary surgery undertaken in 8 centres throughout the United Kingdom. Substantial variations were found in national practice. Use of pre-operative chest X-rays varied from 11.5% of patients in one centre to 54.2% of patients in another centre. The study also found that the chest X-ray report did not seem to have much influence on the decision to operate nor on the decision to use inhalation anaesthesia. The College study failed to find "any evidence at all for the effectiveness of pre-operative chest X-ray when used routinely" and it was estimated that even if the procedure was 10% effective the costs of avoiding one death would be approximately 1 million pounds. These findings provided the impetus for the College to develop guidelines for the use of pre-operative chest X-rays in hospitals in the United Kingdom. Creating a change in clinical practice through the introduction of guidelines is a three stage process: Stage I: introducing the idea of a change in practice. Stage II: introduction of guidelines into clinical practice. Stage III: sustained implementation of guidelines in clinical practice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F G Fowkes, C J Roberts. 1984. Introducing guidelines into clinical practice.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10317512/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Testing for sexually transmitted diseases in U.S. Public health laboratories in 2004.

OBJECTIVE: Appropriate laboratory testing practices are a critical part of sexually transmitted disease (STD) control. GOAL: The goal of this study was to describe the type and volume of STD tests performed in public health laboratories in the United States in 2004. STUDY DESIGN: A web-based survey was made available to 144 members of the Association of Public Health Laboratories. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen laboratories responded (79%). Overall, 3,553,196 chlamydia tests and 3,461,151 gonorrhea tests were performed; 64.4% of chlamydia tests and 60.8% of gonorrhea tests were nucleic acid amplification tests. Ninety-four percent of laboratories performed syphilis testing. Few laboratories used type-specific tests for herpes simplex virus or used new tests for trichomoniasis, bacterial vaginosis, or human papillomavirus. CONCLUSIONS: This survey collected important data that can be used to monitor trends in STD testing practices in public health laboratories.

Diagnostic Tests, Routine↗

Lab tests online--an untapped resource.

Since its launch in 2001, Lab Tests Online has evolved into the go-to site for consumer information about laboratory testing. In some circles, however, it still remains underutilized as an educational tool for patients. This month, editor-in-chief Anthony S. Kurec reviews the growth of Lab Tests Online and details its ongoing metamorphosis.

Diagnostic Tests, Routine↗