Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1029904

[Characterological selection. Doctrinary, deontological and practical problems].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Sparvieri. [Characterological selection. Doctrinary, deontological and practical problems].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1029904/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How jurors use and misuse character evidence.

The Federal Rules of Evidence allow defendants to offer testimony about their good character, but that testimony can be impeached with cross-examination or a rebuttal witness. It is assumed that jurors use the defense's character evidence (CE) to form guilt and conviction judgments but use impeachment evidence only to assess the character witness's credibility. Two experiments tested these assumptions by presenting mock jurors with various forms of CE and impeachment. Participants made trait ratings for the character witness and defendant and guilt and conviction judgments. Positive CE did not affect guilt or conviction judgments, but cross-examination caused a backlash in which judgments were harsher than when no CE was given. Using path analysis, the authors tested a model of the process by which CE and impeachment affect defendant and witness impressions and guilt and conviction judgments. Implications for juror decision making are discussed.

Character↗