Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10289704

Adverse drug reaction reporting system: developing a well-monitored program.

Abstract

The spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) at the St. John's Hospital and Memorial Medical Center was well below that reported in the literature. After review of procedures for reporting of ADRs at these institutions, the authors developed a system that was approved by their joint P & T Committee. The ADR reporting program developed uses concurrent monitoring of most hospital inpatients and a retrospective review of all emergency room patients. In the year after program implementation, 162 ADR reports were documented. From this program, a group of serious ADRs to one agent was identified and reported, both to the Food and Drug Administration and to the manufacturer. A well-developed ADR monitoring program may lead to heightened physician and nurse awareness and early problem identification, possibly decreasing morbidity for hospitalized patients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D J Kilarski, B Ziegler, J Coarse, C Buchanan. 1986. Adverse drug reaction reporting system: developing a well-monitored program.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10289704/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Retained foreign bodies from the view of the OR nurse].

Patient safety in the operating room is of high priority for the surgical team and for all healthcare workers involved. Counting procedures contribute to minimizing potential risks for the patients, especially in preventing them from leaving the operating room with retained, unintended foreign bodies. A total of 64% of operating room nurses involved in a survey are reported as having been involved in a surgical procedure in which the correct count prevented foreign bodies from being left in the patient. In addition, the strengths and potential weak points of the counting procedures could be identified. The results of the survey and drafts for a standard counting control as well as procedural recommendations are presented for discussion. A recommendation can be provided for each surgical department in order to check their own counting methods for avoiding potential risks.

Documentation↗