PubMed · 1027805
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D Brucker, J A Marano. 1976. Hydrocurve.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1027805/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We compared the visual performance of a soft diffractive (DIFF) bifocal contact lens, a near center (CN) concentric bifocal design, and monovision (MV), using a comprehensive vision testing protocol. Fifteen presbyopic subjects who were successfully wearing DIFF bifocal contact lenses participated in the study. Of the three systems tested, MV provided best visual acuity at distance and near; less than one line of acuity was lost relative to best spectacle acuity under all lighting and contrast conditions, and there was less disturbance of a point source of light. Both bifocal corrections gave similar visual acuity performance, with more lines of acuity lost relative to spectacles at near compared to distance. However, the concentric bifocal induced more ghosting at near than the other two systems. Stereopsis was compromised at distance with MV correction, but all systems performed worse than spectacles at near. An understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of presbyopic contact lens options allows the clinician to improve management of the presbyope who wishes to wear contact lenses.
We fit two multifocal soft contact lenses, Bausch & Lomb's Bi-Tech and the Unilens contact lens from Unilens Corporation, in two separate populations of presbyopes. Most patients (24/42, 57%) had no prior contact lens experience. Patients were evaluated at 6 and 12 months for comfort, visual acuity, lens fit, and corneal findings. Both distance and near vision were found to be slightly decreased with each contact lens when compared to best corrected visual acuity with spectacles. Seventy-seven percent (14/18) of the Unilens wearers and 67% (16/24) of the Bi-Tech wearers continued to wear their lenses for at least 1 year. Those who discontinued lens wear did so because they were dissatisfied with their vision. Presbyopes who seek correction with soft contact lenses appear to be more tolerant of a decrease in distance vision than a decrease in near vision. Both lenses were comfortable and no corneal pathology was induced. Our results suggest that the Unilens (simultaneous vision design) provides more predictable correction of presbyopic symptoms than the Bi-Tech (alternating vision design) because it is independent of lower lid position and translation. Both of these lenses are viable options for the correction of presbyopic symptoms.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.