Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10269740

Developing your practice's business plan.

Abstract

Transplantation of organs and tissues provides the clinician with treatment options for many types of organ failure. However, nearly all transplant efforts are limited by a relative scarcity of donor material. Donor organ and tissue availability can be increased by developing suitable preservation methods and by improving the awareness of primary health care providers as to the needs and scope of therapeutic transplantation. Donor material capable of immediate function upon implantation will become available as increasingly effective techniques of tissue and organ preservation develop. These techniques are extremely important for lung, heart, and liver transplantation, where no artificial, long-term methods of support exist, making immediate function a necessity. In Part I of this article, the authors discuss the transplantation of cornea, kidney, heart, lung, and heart-lung block: Part II covers transplantation of liver, pancreas, skin, and bone marrow.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G T Anders. 1985. Developing your practice's business plan.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10269740/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Managing risk: risk perception, trust and control in a Primary Care Partnership.

In this article, managers' perceptions of risk on entering a newly formed primary health care partnership are explored, as are the mechanisms of trust and control used to manage them. The article reports a qualitative component of a 2-year National Health and Medical Research Council funded study of trust within the structures of a Primary Care Partnership (PCP) in Victoria, Australia. Multiple methods of data collection were employed. We found that managers identified risks at system, partnership and agency levels, and that as trust was built, concern about risks diminished. Trust effectively facilitated joint action, but it was betrayed on occasions, in which case the informal power of group process was used to contain the problems. The implications of this study for policy makers are in terms of understanding how perceptions of risk are constructed, the ways managers use social control to create a safer context in which to locate the trust-based relationships that facilitate joint action, and the importance of institutional arrangements. Without trust, joint action is hard to achieve, and without control, it is difficult to prevent breaches of trust from inhibiting joint action.

Group Practice↗