Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10231833

Does environmental data collection need statistics?

Abstract

The term 'statistics' with reference to environmental science and policymaking might mean different things: the development of statistical methodology, the methodology developed by statisticians to interpret and analyse such data, or the statistical data that are needed to understand environmental pollution and to identify possible policy options. This may and indeed has led to confusion on the part of the users of 'statistics' in environmental science and policymaking. This paper focuses on some of the needs of environmental scientists for statistical methodologies to help us do our jobs better. Statisticians and statistics can contribute to environmental science and the environmental policymaking process in three main ways. First, in describing phenomena: this may in some cases be a non-trivial application of statistical methods. Second, by assessing causal relations: (multivariate) analysis techniques can be applied in establishing the (causal) relations between pressures, state and impact. Third, by setting and checking of standards: uncertainties between the dose-effect relations and the formulation of the standard, and the standard and the state of the environment should be carefully dealt with. Statisticians may help in formulating the standards in such a way that standard checking is as straightforward as possible.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Pulles. 1999. Does environmental data collection need statistics?. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470515600.ch12

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A specialist toxicity database (TRACE) is more effective than its larger, commercially available counterparts.

The retrieval precision and recall of a specialist bibliographic toxicity database (TRACE) and a range of widely available bibliographic databases used to identify toxicity papers were compared. The analysis indicated that the larger size and resources of the major bibliographic databases did not, for a series of test queries, assure superior retrieval of relevant papers. The specialist database, in which document selection and indexing is undertaken by the same expert toxicologists who use the database in their day-to-day work, achieved markedly better retrieval, using simpler search strategies, than the other databases. Specialist databases may offer a valuable alternative to the existing major bibliographic databases. The concept of relevance, as used to determine the effectiveness of bibliographic databases, is discussed.

Data Collection↗

Demographic characteristics of US medical school admission committees.

CONTEXT: Although concerns continue to be raised about the diversity of the US physician workforce, there has never been a nationwide survey of both the sex and underrepresented minority (URM) composition of medical school admission committees. OBJECTIVE: To document US medical school admission committee membership in several demographic domains, including sex and URM (African American, Mexican American, mainland Puerto Rican, Native American, Native Hawaiian, and Native Alaskan) status. DESIGN: Mailed survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Deans or directors of admission at 85 US medical schools that were members of the Association of American Medical Colleges (response rate, 70%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of 1999-2000 school-year committee members in demographic categories, such as sex, URM status, physician or medical student status; compensation status. RESULTS: The overall ratio of men to women on admission committees was 1.77 to 1. On average, 16% of committee members were from URM groups. Physicians with URM status comprised 8% of committee membership; 51% of committees had 1 or 0 URM physicians. Seventy-four percent of committees had at least 1 medical student; medical students comprised 15% of total membership. Ninety-one percent of committees operated on a volunteer basis. CONCLUSION: Although representation of women and persons with URM status on medical school admission committees has improved since 1972, URM membership, in particular, remains low. JAMA. 2000;284:1111-1113

Data Collection↗