Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10226926

Can we learn from eugenics?

D Wikler
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Eugenics casts a long shadow over contemporary genetics. Any measure, whether in clinical genetics or biotechnology, which is suspected of eugenic intent is likely to be opposed on that ground. Yet there is little consensus on what this word signifies, and often only a remote connection to the very complex set of social movements which took that name. After a brief historical summary of eugenics, this essay attempts to locate any wrongs inherent in eugenic doctrines. Four candidates are examined and rejected. The moral challenge posed by eugenics for genetics in our own time, I argue, is to achieve social justice.

Explore related subjects

Cultural DiversityEthics, MedicalEugenicsGenetic DeterminismGenetics, BehavioralHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansInternationalityMandatory ProgramsMoral ObligationsNational SocialismSocial JusticeSocial ResponsibilitySocial ValuesVoluntary ProgramsAnalytical ApproachGenetics and ReproductionNineteenth CenturyTwentieth CenturyHistorical ArticleJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Wikler. 1999. Can we learn from eugenics?. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.2.183

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Professionalism in modern medicine: does the emperor have any clothes?

The virtues that constitute medical professionalism have been aptly described in multiple position statements from professional organizations and individuals. These professional virtues depend on particular moral community traditions to undergird and sustain them. Attempts to ground these virtues in narratives intrinsic to medical practice--in the moral consensus of physicians or patients, in the self-regulating character of medicine as a profession, in the Hippocratic tradition, or in the physician-patient encounter--have been unsuccessful. Modern medicine must, therefore, look outside its own methodological and clinical practices for grounding narratives sufficient to sustain the professional virtues set forth in the recently published professionalism statements. These professionalism statements are written to capture consensus, and they rarely acknowledge the external moral traditions on which the virtues depend, because doing so would, in a pluralistic culture, entail the risk of moral disagreement and division. The authors argue that meaningful education in professionalism must look beyond the consensus statements and deeply engage the particular cultural traditions external to the practice of medicine that sustain the professional virtues. Medical professionalism curricula should embody an open pluralism, giving voice to diverse moral communities, encouraging critical self-exploration and discussion about the truth claims of these communities, and, if possible, facilitating the integration of students' professional development with their ongoing participation in these communities. Engagement with and participation in these sustaining moral communities would promote the cultivation of virtue capable of withstanding the economic and social threats to professionalism that are inherent in modern medical practice.

Cultural Diversity↗