PubMed · 10185477
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E Friedman. Breaking ranks.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10185477/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In Chappel v Hart, the High Court upheld the decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales that a surgeon was liable for failing to warn a patient of a previously unreported complication of a procedure. The patient, if properly warned, would have had the operation at another time, probably with a more experienced surgeon. The decision has important implications for doctors when advising patients of the risks of surgery.
A desk sergeant at each of 48 Michigan police stations and 52 South Carolina police stations was surveyed about knowledge and experience of Tarasoff warnings. Respondents at 45 stations reported receiving warnings from mental health professionals, with a mean+/-SD of 3. 7+/-8.4 warnings a year. Only three respondents were familiar with the Tarasoff ruling. Twenty-four stations had a specific policy on such warnings. Twenty-seven stations would not warn a potential victim. Michigan stations were much more likely than South Carolina stations to have experience with or policies on Tarasoff warnings. Because police apparently have limited experience with Tarasoff warnings, calling them may not be the best way to protect potential victims from patients making threats.