Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10176359

Evolving issues in laser safety.

Abstract

The approach to laser safety has come a long way since the 1960s when the first guidelines were issued by defense research organizations in the US and the UK, and then by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Although the search for 'eye-safe' numbers continues in a few laboratories, this work is almost exclusively centered on deriving retinal thresholds for ultra-short (sub-nanosecond) lasers. Setting limits in this temporal region has been difficult, since there are conflicting data sets and there is a limited amount of data to extrapolate to other spectral regions. In the standards arena, the concentrated efforts have been in terms of product classification and attempts to resolve the eternal question of 'how safe is safe?'. Recent efforts to revise safety standards have not always taken into account the historical rationale for the maximum permissible exposures and forget that safety factors were already factored into the limits and further safety factors are quite unnecessary. Finally, the study of accidents raises the question of whether our approach to eye protection and enclosures are adequate and whether separate standards and guidance is needed for different applications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D H Sliney. 1997. Evolving issues in laser safety.. https://doi.org/10.2351/1.4745473

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Ultracompact autocorrelator for multiphoton microscopy.

Pulse temporal characterization is a fundamental task when operating a Ti:Sapphire ultrafast laser system for multiphoton microscopy applications. In the present report, an ultracompact autocorrelator setup and a simple procedure is reported to perform pulse width measurements at the focal plane of the microscope objective without the need of any further instrumentation, aside from a few optical elements, since the confocal microscope, detection, data acquisition, processing, and displaying capabilities are used.

Equipment Design↗

A modified relocatable stereotactic frame for irradiation of eye melanoma: design and evaluation of treatment accuracy.

PURPOSE: To describe a reliable, patient-friendly relocatable stereotactic frame for irradiation of eye melanoma and to evaluate the repositioning accuracy of the stereotactic treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An extra construction with a blinking light and a camera is attached to a noninvasive relocatable Gill-Thomas-Cosman stereotactic frame. The position of the blinking light is in front of the unaffected eye and can be adjusted to achieve an optimal position for irradiation. The position of the diseased eye is monitored with a small camera. A planning CT scan is performed with the affected eye in treatment position and is matched with an MR scan to improve the accuracy of the delineation of the tumor. Both the translation and rotation of the affected eye are calculated by comparing the planning CT scan with a control CT scan, performed after the radiation therapy is completed. RESULTS: Nineteen irradiated eye melanoma patients were analyzed. All patients received 5 fractions of 10 Gy within 5 days. The depth-confirmation helmet measurements of the day-to-day treatment position of the skull within the Gill-Thomas-Cosman frame were analyzed in the anteroposterior, lateral, and vertical directions and were 0.1 +/- 0.3, 0.0 +/- 0.2, and 0.2 +/- 0.2 mm (mean +/- SD), respectively. The average translations of the eye on the planning and control CT scan were 0.1 +/- 0.3 mm, 0.1 +/- 0.4, and 0.1 +/- 0.5 mm, respectively. The median rotation of the diseased eye was 8.3 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: The described Rotterdam eye fixation system turned out to be a feasible, reliable, and patient-friendly system.

Equipment Design↗