Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10164677

Critical pathways.

Abstract

A critical Pathway (CP) is a clinical management tool that helps medical care providers coordinate the delivery of patient care for a particular case type or condition. As a guide to usual treatment patterns, a CP gives a view of the "big picture." The CP usually recommends a total treatment regimen. Treatment regimens are formulated through the consensus of a multi-disciplinary collaboration of all those involved in a patient's care. If developed and implemented properly, critical paths can lead to desirable outcomes for the patient and improved operating effectiveness/efficiency for the healthcare facility. Components of CPs often include protocols, algorithms, and clinical practice guidelines. Metrics, bench-marks, compliance, and variances become common terms among members of the healthcare team. Although CPs have gained wide acceptance as inpatient management tools, they are rapidly being sought for outpatient settings as well. This article details the CP process and cites examples of two hospitals that have used CPs to reduce length of stay and cut costs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M K Roark. Critical pathways.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10164677/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗