Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10164672

Two steps forward, one step back.

Abstract

Participants at a community health information network in Glens Falls, N.Y., have come face-to-face with obstacles that could have meant the end to this rural health network that the New York Department of Health and the John A. Hartford Foundation helped launch more than two years ago. Instead, John Laliberte, Glens Falls Hospital's director of information systems, and the rest of the IS team are recovering from some setbacks and preparing to increase the CHIN's capabilities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J P Wenzlick. Two steps forward, one step back.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10164672/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Developing performance indicators that reflect an expanded view of health: findings from the use of an innovative methodology.

BACKGROUND: The increasing presence of managed health care in the United States has been accompanied by the widespread use of performance indicators to assess health plans along various dimensions of quality. Current performance indicator sets virtually ignore psychosocial and behavioral factors in the prevention and management of illness, especially chronic illness, in spite of documented evidence in the medical literature of the importance of these factors. Instead, current indicator sets focus primarily on biomedical interventions to prevent, treat, and manage illness. METHODOLOGY: In a novel method for developing performance indicators--the use of a storytelling methodology--eight interdisciplinary panels, composed of health care experts at the community, state, and national levels, each completed two stories about patients with chronic illnesses. The first story described experiences a patient might have in the health care system as it is today; the second story retold the events that might transpire if attention to psychosocial and behavioral factors were integrated into the health care system. FINDINGS: Differences between the two sets of stories developed by the panels revealed common themes and specific areas where indicator development might prove fruitful. Performance indicators were identified from these themes, and work is underway to operationalize them; to identify barriers and opportunities for their inclusion in indicator sets; and to further document their potential health and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: Although not scientifically rigorous, the storytelling method was found to provide consistent results and may be applied to many aspects of the health care planning process, health education, and quality improvement efforts.

Community Networks↗

Collaboration in disability policies--collaboration between stakeholders of disability policies in the South and in the North.

Four studies have been recently undertaken at the Centre for International Child Health on the collaboration between the stakeholders of disability policies, in Southern and Northern countries. Informed by the literature, the authors have explored the roles disabled people's organizations, non-governmental organizations, government and professionals play in the design, provision and evaluation of services for disabled people. They also highlight the different forms participation can take and their most relevant features. The main factors influencing collaboration processes are then classified in three different categories: social factors, ideology-related factors and project-related factors. They are subsequently analysed. The first group encompasses the societal framework in which collaboration may take place, while the identity of the stakeholders is reflected in the ideology-related factors. The nature of the activities undertaken by stakeholders is characterized by the third group of factors. In the conclusion it is suggested that stakeholders, and especially disabled people's counterparts, should increase their awareness of the social model of disability, adopt participatory practices and promote participation at higher levels. However, they should acknowledge that it implies more trust between partners and an alteration of their structures.

Community Networks↗