Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10159724

Amblyopia.

Abstract

Although the studies of amblyopia, especially the amblyopiogenic factors, symptomatology, terminology, and classification have been well clarified both in clinical aspects and in animal models, detailed pathophysiological mechanisms and psychophysical symptoms have still remained nuclear in many respects. As von Noorden (Helveston et al., Symposium on strabismus: Transactions of the New Orleans Academy of Ophthalmology, St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1978: 1-9) mentioned, the complexity of the amblyopia syndrome is symbolized as an iceberg and reduced visual acuity is the most tangible of many disturbances of visual function. This past year, several articles on amblyopia were published in many journals, and the authors review these articles which are grossly classified into three categories: 1) pathophysiology; 2) symptoms, examinations and diagnosis; and 3) treatment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Awaya, Y Watanabe. 1995. Amblyopia.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00055735-199510000-00003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Genome-Wide and Rare Variant Association Studies of Amblyopia in Admixed American and African Ancestry Groups.

OBJECTIVE: To identify genetic variants associated with amblyopia in African (AFR) and Admixed American (AMR) ancestry groups, expanding on previous studies conducted in European ancestry. DESIGN: Retrospective ancestry-stratified genome-wide association study (GWAS) and gene-level rare variant association study (RVAS). PARTICIPANTS: Participants in the All of Us Research Program from AFR and AMR ancestry groups who had whole-genome sequencing available. Cases and controls were distinguished based on the presence of International Classification of Diseases 9/10/SNOMED diagnosis codes for amblyopia in electronic health records. This yielded ancestry-stratified subsets of 269 cases and 71 585 controls of AMR ancestry and 366 cases and 79 460 controls of AFR ancestry. METHODS: Stratified logistic regression models were adjusted for age, biological sex, and the top 10 principal components of genomic ancestry. GWAS was limited to common variants (minor allele frequency &#x2265;1%), and RVAS was limited to rare variants with coding sequence-altering effects (minor allele frequency >1%, exonic only, excluding synonymous variants) aggregated at the gene level using the SKAT algorithm. Downstream analyses of the significant variants were performed using KEGG and GO pathway analysis and STRING database queries for protein-protein interactions and gene-gene interactions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms were determined to have genome-wide significance if P < 5e-8 in the GWAS, and genes were determined to have significant association with amblyopia in the RVAS if P < 8.0 &#xd7; 10-4. RESULTS: In the AMR GWAS, 245 unique single-nucleotide polymorphisms mapping to 97 distinct loci were identified, notably within neurodevelopmental and axonal guidance genes, including ROBO1, SEMA4B, PTPRD, NRXN1, and CAMK2D. The AFR GWAS identified 11 significant variants corresponding to 6 loci mapping primarily to long noncoding RNAs and pseudogenes. The AMR RVAS identified 15 genes, including axonal transport genes (KIF1B and KIF7) and growth factor signaling genes (EGF, ERBIN, and AKAP17A). The AFR RVAS identified a single gene, DLG2, which encodes the postsynaptic protein PSD-93, which promotes the closure of the sensitive period of neuroplasticity for vision in early childhood. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic risk architectures for amblyopia differ across ancestries but fundamentally converge on neurodevelopmental signaling, cortical synapse assembly, and sensitive period plasticity rather than ocular structural dynamics. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Amblyopia↗

Compound grating discrimination in extrafoveal and amblyopic vision.

Compound grating discrimination was measured in normal foveal and extrafoveal vision as well as in central vision of amblyopic subjects. Two types of discrimination were examined: 0 degrees versus 180 degrees and 90 degrees versus 270 degrees phase shift of the second harmonic relative to the fundamental. In common with several previous studies, we found that both 0/180 and 90/270 discriminations are possible in extrafoveal vision. However, we show that differences in foveal and extrafoveal sensitivity can be eliminated for both types of discrimination by scaling the stimulus size appropriately. The extent of spatial magnification necessary to equate foveal and extrafoveal performance differed markedly, with 90/270 discriminations requiring much more magnification. In the amblyopic subjects, the magnitude of the 90/270 deficit was greater than the 0/180 deficit in all six amblyopes tested. In common with previous investigations, we suggest that the visual system adopts a discrimination strategy, based upon differences in local features, between the patterns to be discriminated. One process registers positional relationships, while a second process registers local contrast differences. In this context, the reduced ability of the normal periphery and amblyopic fovea to perform mirror-symmetric discriminations is explained in terms of losses in positional acuity.

Amblyopia↗