Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10154218

From controlled to committed.

Abstract

Most of us agree that people are our most important resource. Yet we spend a minimal amount of time learning more about human behavior, communication, and how our attitudes and behavior impact employee performance. Instead we rely on traditional methods of negative reinforcement in an attempt to control our areas of responsibility. While these methods can render some short-term success, managers and organizations that succeed during these times of change and fierce competition will be those that take the time to understand and capture the power of a committed workforce. The committed workforce is energized, not simply compliant, as a result of having basic human needs for achievement satisfied, belonging to a group, and receiving recognition for its contributions. Committed workers typically describe the manager as one who has the ability to give them a great degree of control over their area of influence. We all know that we don't change our leadership style like we change clothes. Old habits die hard. it takes a personal commitment and lots of practice to rid outselves of habits and behavior that no longer serve our departments and facilities. This commitment, however, is crucial to survival. As managers, we must cope with increasing ambiguity and uncertainty in the workplace. To survive these challenges, we must improve our interpersonal skills and ability to successfully bring out the best in others. I believe that success will continue for managers who not only increase their knowledge and technical ability, but who also inspire their workers to move forward with a collective sense of enthusiasm and purpose.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Hess. 1996. From controlled to committed.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10154218/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

NICE methodological guidelines and decision making in the National Health Service in England and Wales.

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) responds to requests by the Department of Health for guidance on the use of selected new and established technologies in the National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales. This paper asks whether the NICE methodological guidelines help NHS decision makers meet the objectives of maximum health improvements from NHS resources and an equitable availability of technologies. The analytical basis of the guidelines is a comparison of the costs and consequences of new and existing methods of dealing with particular conditions using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. We explain why information on the costs and consequences of a particular technology in isolation is insufficient to address issues of efficiency of resource use. We argue that to increase efficiency, decision makers need information on opportunity costs. We show that in the absence of such information decision makers cannot identify the efficient use of resources. Finally we argue that economics provides valid methods for identifying the maximisation of health improvements for a given allocation of resources and we describe an alternative practical approach to this problem. Drawing on the experience of Ontario, Canada where an approach similar to that proposed by NICE has been in use for almost a decade, and recent reports about the consequences of NICE decisions to date, we conclude that instead of increasing the efficiency or equity of the use of NHS resources, NICE methodological guidelines may lead to: uncontrolled increases in NHS expenditures without evidence of any increase in total health improvements; increased inequities in the availability of services; and concerns about the sustainability of public funding for new technologies.

Decision Making, Organizational↗

Do you know who will be vaccinated at your ED?

The administration of the smallpox vaccine is imminent, so emergency department managers are making difficult decisions about which individuals should be vaccinated. If all attending physicians are vaccinated, these individuals can care for patients with suspected smallpox. Consider offering vaccine first to staff who have been immunized previously. Survey staff to find out which individuals have contraindications for the vaccine.

Decision Making, Organizational↗