Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10153770

HEDIS: implementation issues.

K Hiltunen
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Historically, employers have asked health plans to measure performance in terms of quality, utilization, satisfaction, and cost. As organizations collected these data, employers realized that rarely were all the data comparable. Several employers, such as Xerox Corporation, Digital Equipment Corporation, and Bull HN Information Systems, Inc., agreed to work together to create reporting criteria that would standardize measurement. This collaboration resulted in the Health Plan Employer Data Information Set (HEDIS) criteria. This article reviews some of the implementation issues and decisions that a plan must resolve to gather accurate HEDIS data.

Explore related subjects

Data CollectionEducation, ContinuingEmployer Health CostsHealth Benefit Plans, EmployeeInformation ServicesManaged Care ProgramsQuality of Health CareUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Hiltunen. HEDIS: implementation issues.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-1474.1996.tb00821.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Quantitative research is designed to test well-specified hypotheses, determine whether an intervention did more harm than good, and find out how much a risk factor predisposes persons to disease. Equally important, qualitative research offers insight into emotional and experiential phenomena in health care to determine what, how, and why. There are 4 essential aspects of qualitative analysis. First, the participant selection must be well reasoned and their inclusion must be relevant to the research question. Second, the data collection methods must be appropriate for the research objectives and setting. Third, the data collection process, which includes field observation, interviews, and document analysis, must be comprehensive enough to support rich and robust descriptions of the observed events. Fourth, the data must be appropriately analyzed and the findings adequately corroborated by using multiple sources of information, more than 1 investigator to collect and analyze the raw data, member checking to establish whether the participants' viewpoints were adequately interpreted, or by comparison with existing social science theories. Qualitative studies offer an alternative when insight into the research is not well established or when conventional theories seem inadequate. JAMA. 2000;284:357-362

Data Collection↗