Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10143049

When the talking is over: using action learning.

Abstract

Outlines the workings of action learning sets, team-building and cultural change, and explores the use of action learning methodology in the development of health-care managers. Outlines the spin-off benefits of the implementation of action learning at Ashworth Hospital, such as self-discipline, commitment, improved morale, empowerment, etc. Concludes that it could be a powerful tool for future health-care management.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Newton, M J Wilkinson. 1995. When the talking is over: using action learning.. https://doi.org/10.1108/09552069510084051

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Change counselling in diabetes: the development of a training programme for the diabetes team.

Skills in counselling for behaviour change may help staff working in diabetes care to facilitate self management in people with diabetes. A feasibility study was conducted to define the essential competencies (attitudes, knowledge and skills), training methods, and assess whether this approach was practicable in a diabetes resource centre. Semi structured interviews with staff were routinely conducted throughout the duration of the study. The findings suggest that the stages of change model, motivational interviewing and behavioural techniques are relevant to work in this area. Acquiring the competencies was harder to achieve than anticipated, though most were evident after one years training. The most valued training methods were individual supervision and video examples. However, the competencies were difficult to apply in the clinical setting given time constraints, the strength of existing staff routines and the patients' readiness to change. The lessons learned and suggestions for future work are presented.

Competency-Based Education↗

Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe: a Delphi study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the common core competencies required for occupational physicians in Europe. METHOD: A modified Delphi survey was conducted among members of the European Association of Schools of Occupational Medicine (EASOM), the Occupational Medicine Section of the Union of European Medical Specialities (UEMS), and of the European Network of Societies of Occupational Physicians (ENSOP). An initial questionnaire based on the training syllabus of the United Kingdom Faculty of Occupational Medicine was circulated and respondents were asked to rate the importance of each item. The results were discussed at a conference on the subject of competencies. A further questionnaire was developed and circulated which asked respondents to rank items within each section. RESULTS: There was a 74% response in the first round and an 80% response in the second. Respondents' ratings from most important to least important were; occupational hazards to health, research methods, health promotion, occupational health law and ethics, communications, assessment of disability, environmental medicine, and management. In the second round, among those topics ranked most highly were; hazards to health and the illnesses which they cause, control of risks, and diagnoses of work related ill health. Topics such as principles of occupational safety and selection of personal protection equipment were of least importance. Although the assessment of fitness was regarded as important, monitoring and advising on sickness absence were not highly rated. Management competency was regarded as of low importance. CONCLUSION: This survey identified that respondents had traditional disease focused views of the competencies required of occupational physicians and that competencies were lagging behind the evolving definition of occupational health.

Competency-Based Education↗