PubMed · 10142795
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
G Anderson, B Armstrong. 1995. Client/server: where are we really?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10142795/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: The linkage of records which refer to the same entity in separate data collections is a common requirement in public health and biomedical research. Traditionally, record linkage techniques have required that all the identifying data in which links are sought be revealed to at least one party, often a third party. This necessarily invades personal privacy and requires complete trust in the intentions of that party and their ability to maintain security and confidentiality. Dusserre, Quantin, Bouzelat and colleagues have demonstrated that it is possible to use secure one-way hash transformations to carry out follow-up epidemiological studies without any party having to reveal identifying information about any of the subjects - a technique which we refer to as "blindfolded record linkage". A limitation of their method is that only exact comparisons of values are possible, although phonetic encoding of names and other strings can be used to allow for some types of typographical variation and data errors. METHODS: A method is described which permits the calculation of a general similarity measure, the n-gram score, without having to reveal the data being compared, albeit at some cost in computation and data communication. This method can be combined with public key cryptography and automatic estimation of linkage model parameters to create an overall system for blindfolded record linkage. RESULTS: The system described offers good protection against misdeeds or security failures by any one party, but remains vulnerable to collusion between or simultaneous compromise of two or more parties involved in the linkage operation. In order to reduce the likelihood of this, the use of last-minute allocation of tasks to substitutable servers is proposed. Proof-of-concept computer programmes written in the Python programming language are provided to illustrate the similarity comparison protocol. CONCLUSION: Although the protocols described in this paper are not unconditionally secure, they do suggest the feasibility, with the aid of modern cryptographic techniques and high speed communication networks, of a general purpose probabilistic record linkage system which permits record linkage studies to be carried out with negligible risk of invasion of personal privacy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Traditional paper professional package inserts (PPIs) are used on a daily basis by a variety of healthcare providers to locate and disseminate drug information. Unfortunately, paper PPIs are sometimes not accessible to the healthcare provider, appear unreadable due to varied font sizes, and are often considered not to be user-friendly. In December 2000, the Food and Drug Administration proposed regulations that would revise the format of PPIs. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether electronic delivery of PPI information is achievable in community pharmacy practice settings. METHODS: Electronic PPIs are an alternative means of delivering this information. This 12-week proof-of-concept study evaluated the Health Information Designs/Thomson Healthcare and Etreby Computer Company for electronic delivery of PPIs in 6 chain and 4 independent community pharmacies, with 5 pharmacies evaluating each system. Participating pharmacists were asked 9 questions designed to determine the feasibility of implementing electronic PPI delivery, as well as pharmacist satisfaction with each system. RESULTS: Pharmacists deemed both systems to be accessible and user-friendly. Pharmacists from both groups felt that the electronic PPIs were challenging to read and that printing took too long. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies in a more diverse selection of dispensing sites, including pharmacies (community and hospital based), clinics, and physician practices, need to be performed to maximize the use of electronic PPIs.