PubMed · 10123931
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J H Vogler. 1990. Birthing centers.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10123931/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: The Norwegian Board of Health has proposed to divide the delivery units into three categories. For several of today's smaller consultant managed units this could lead to a reclassification into midwife managed units. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During 1997 and 1998 the community hospital in Lofoten has tried out a modified type of midwife managed unit. By a continuous selection process a high risk and a low risk group of gravidas were identified. The high risk group was referred to the central hospital in Bodø, while the low risk group was offered to deliver locally. RESULTS: Previously more than 90% delivered at the community hospital in Lofoten, while approximately 70% still delivered locally during the trial period. There were no deliveries during transport and no serious complications for mother or child caused by the new system. The community hospital had facilities for performing emergency caesarean sections. In 1997 nine caesarean sections out of 211 deliveries and in 1998 four out of 224 were performed. The caesarean section rate for the total population was lower during the trial period than over the previous five years. INTERPRETATION: A modified midwife managed unit could be a good alternative for small consultant managed units if the Norwegian Board of Health's proposal is carried through.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Many home-like birth centres have been established near conventional labour wards for the care of pregnant women who prefer and require little or no medical intervention during labour and birth. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of care in a home-like birth environment compared to care in a conventional labour ward, on labour and birth outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register was searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing a home-like institutional birth environment to conventional hospital care for pregnant women at low risk of obstetric complications. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed. MAIN RESULTS: Five trials involving almost 8000 women were included. Substantial numbers of women allocated to home-like settings were transferred to standard care before or during labour, making interpretation of results difficult. Allocation to a home-like setting was associated with lower rates of intrapartum analgesia/anaesthesia (odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 0.93), fetal heart rate abnormalities (0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.81), augmented labour, and immobility during labour, as well as greater satisfaction with care, and increased likelihood of sore nipples and mastitis. There was a non-statistically significant trend towards higher perinatal mortality in the home-like setting (odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 2.78). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There appear to be some benefits from home-like settings for childbirth, although increased support from caregivers may be more important. Caregivers and clients in home-like settings need to watch for signs of complications.