Utilization control in HMOs.

L Debrock; R J Arnould

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10122876

Utilization control in HMOs.

L Debrock·R J Arnould

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) have emerged as a major vehicle to reduce transaction costs associated with defining the limits of health insurance coverage and to provide appropriate provider incentives. This article explains the heterogeneous set of incentives used by HMOs to reimburse providers and performs empirical tests of their effectiveness. The empirical analyses reveal that utilization of health care services is reduced when (1) physician compensation is based on salary or capitation arrangements rather than some measure of output; (2) bonuses and paybacks are based on individual rather than group performance; and (3) when the HMO operates as a proprietary (for-profit) organization. Utilization is not significantly affected by incentives placed on the hospital. Finally, physician ownership of the HMO was found to lead to higher levels of utilization.

Explore related subjects

Capitation Fee Cost Control Evaluation Studies as Topic Health Maintenance Organizations Hospitals Illinois Interprofessional Relations Medical Staff Physician Incentive Plans Practice Patterns, Physicians'Reimbursement, Incentive Salaries and Fringe Benefits Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

L Debrock, R J Arnould. 1992. Utilization control in HMOs.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10122876/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Medical care use and selection in a social health insurance with an equalization fund: evidence from Colombia.

This paper studies the relationship between health status and insurance participation, and between insurance status and medical use in the context of a social health insurance with an equalization fund (SHIEF). Under this system, revenues from a mandatory payroll tax are collected into a single pool (equalization fund) that reimburses for-profit insurance companies according to a capitated formula. Although competition should induce insurers to control costs without reducing the quality of service necessary to attract consumers, limitations in the capitation formula might induce insurers to select against bad risks, and limitations in the contribution system might induce more healthy individuals to evade enrollment. A three-equation model having social health insurance, private health insurance, and using medical services is estimated using a 1997 Colombian household survey. Consistent with similar studies, participation in SHIEF increases medical care use. On the other hand, the evidence on selection is somewhat mixed: individuals who report good health status are more likely to participate in SHIEF, while those without a chronic condition are less likely to participate in SHIEF.

Capitation Fee↗

PubMed2003

Cream-skimming, incentives for efficiency and payment system.

Reform proposals of health care systems in several countries have advocated variations of a risk adjustment/capitation system. These proposals face a serious objection: incentives to risk selection are prevalent in the system. By now, considerable literature has been devoted to finding ways of mitigating, if not eliminating, this problem, while at the same time preserving incentives to efficiency. We contribute to this debate presenting a transfer system that, under some circumstances, attains both provider efficiency and no risk selection. The transfer system extends typical linear payment systems. It can be interpreted as a fixed transfer in the beginning of the period plus an ex-post fund at the end of the period. The novelty rests in the way contributions to this fund are defined.

Capitation Fee↗

PubMed2003

Paying doctors by salary: a controlled study of general practitioner behaviour in England.

The study aim was to evaluate the impact of the experimental introduction of salaried contracts in England on general practitioner (GP) behaviour and the quality of care. A controlled before-and-after design was implemented involving ten practices of standard contract GPs, paid largely by capitation and fee-for-service, and ten salaried GP practices. Diaries and routinely available data were used to assess GP workload, and patient assessments of the quality of care were obtained by postal questionnaire. GPs in salaried practices spent less time on practice administration but more working out-of-hours and in direct patient care, allowing more patients to be seen. Total list sizes were smaller in salaried compared with standard contract practices, but lists per GP were higher because of staffing policies. Salaried GPs tended to provide shorter consultations compared with standard contract GPs, prescribe in fewer consultations, but referral rates were similar. Quality was rated as higher for seven out of thirteen aspects of care examined in salaried practices and two in standard contract practices. However, none of these differences were statistically significant. To conclude, salaried contracts did not adversely affect GP productivity and had little impact on other aspects of GP behaviour or the quality of care provided.

Capitation Fee↗