PubMed · 10121761
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Mattar. 1992. Networking for efficiency.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10121761/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Radiofrequency, whether it is used for pacing or for its thermal liberation properties, has been investigated as a treatment for sleep-disordered breathing. Diaphragmatic pacing has a long history. The problems associated with pacing, which are related to patient selection, equipment failure, disturbances at the electrode/nerve interface, neuromuscular function failure, muscle fatigue, and the physiological consequences of stimulation, will have to be resolved with XIIth nerve stimulation. Radiofrequency thermal ablation has been applied on the tongue of an animal model. In man, turbinates, soft palate tissue and the base of tongue have been treated. These feasibility studies have demonstrated that obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and upper airway resistance syndrome can be completely controlled using radiofrequency thermal ablation in some subjects. These results can be obtained without complications related to speech, taste or swallowing. The treatment can be administered as an outpatient procedure, but many applications are needed, and treatment may span 6 months. Too high a level of radiofrequency will cause pain or otherwise avoidable complications. The determination of which patients will benefit most from these procedures will require further multi-center, placebo-controlled studies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: Despite widespread reliance on chart abstraction for quality measurement, concerns persist about its reliability and validity. We prospectively evaluated the validity of chart abstraction by directly comparing it with the gold standard of reports by standardized patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty randomly selected general internal medicine residents and attending faculty physicians at the primary care clinics of two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers blindly evaluated and treated actor-patients (standardized patients) who had one of four common diseases: diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, or low back pain. Charts from the visits were abstracted using explicit quality criteria; standardized patients completed a checklist containing the same criteria. For each physician, quality was measured for two different cases of the four conditions (a total of 160 physician-patient encounters). We compared chart abstraction with standardized-patient reports for four aspects of the encounter: taking the history, examining the patient, making the diagnosis, and prescribing appropriate treatment. The sensitivity and specificity of chart abstraction were calculated. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) chart abstraction score was 54% +/- 9%, substantially less than the mean score on the standardized-patient checklist of 68% +/- 9% (P <0.001). This finding was similar for all four conditions and at both sites. "False positives"-chart-recorded necessary care actions not reported by the standardized patients-resulted in a specificity of only 81%. The overall sensitivity of chart abstraction for necessary care was only 70%. CONCLUSIONS: Chart abstraction underestimates the quality of care for common outpatient general medical conditions when compared with standardized-patient reports. The medical record is neither sensitive nor specific. Quality measurements derived from chart abstraction may have important shortcomings, particularly as the basis for drawing policy conclusions or making management decisions.