Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10114822

Pharmacy drug error awareness program.

Abstract

Medication errors are a major concern in hospital pharmacy practice. The prevention of medication errors involves mainly the departments of pharmacy and nursing. Though there are many safeguards used to prevent medication errors, they still occur, posing potential harm to patients. To decrease the chance for medication errors to occur pharmacists must take the responsibility to expand their knowledge and teach others about frequent errors. In an effort to decrease medication errors during 1990 at Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center, Fresno, California, the pharmacy department evaluated the errors made during the calendar year 1989. This evaluation provided information concerning the most frequently occurring medication errors. This information was used to initiate a drug error awareness program (DEAP).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J N Weber, J K Hatai. 1991. Pharmacy drug error awareness program.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10114822/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Coding-complete genome sequence of grapevine leafroll-associated virus 13 from grapevine in California.

In this study, we report the coding-complete genome sequence of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 13 (GLRaV-13), isolate CA8881, detected in Vitis vinifera in California, USA. The genome sequence exhibited over 95% nucleotide identity with previously reported GLRaV-13 isolates and contributed to better understanding of the genetic diversity of ampeloviruses infecting grapevine.

California↗

Using standardised patients to measure physicians' practice: validation study using audio recordings.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of standardised patients to measure the quality of physicians' practice. DESIGN: Validation study of standardised patients' assessments. Physicians saw unannounced standardised patients presenting with common outpatient conditions. The standardised patients covertly tape recorded their visit and completed a checklist of quality criteria immediately afterwards. Their assessments were compared against independent assessments of the recordings by a trained medical records abstractor. SETTING: Four general internal medicine primary care clinics in California. PARTICIPANTS: 144 randomly selected consenting physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of agreement between the patients' assessments and independent assessment. RESULTS: 40 visits, one per standardised patient, were recorded. The overall rate of agreement between the standardised patients' checklists and the independent assessment of the audio transcripts was 91% (kappa=0.81). Disaggregating the data by medical condition, site, level of physicians' training, and domain (stage of the consultation) gave similar rates of agreement. Sensitivity of the standardised patients' assessments was 95%, and specificity was 85%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Standardised patients' assessments seem to be a valid measure of the quality of physicians' care for a variety of common medical conditions in actual outpatient settings. Properly trained standardised patients compare well with independent assessment of recordings of the consultations and may justify their use as a "gold standard" in comparing the quality of care across sites or evaluating data obtained from other sources, such as medical records and clinical vignettes.

California↗