Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10112983

Flow charting for quality improvement.

Abstract

This article analyzes the merits of flow charts in their relatively new application to healthcare quality management. Specific examples are given that show how a step-by-step diagram can clarify policies and procedures. Patrice Spath explains "imagineering," a technique for problem identification that compares the steps that a process actually follows with a flow chart of what steps the process should follow. In the discrepancies between the two, problems are revealed. Warnings are given that each detail in a flow chart must pertain to its actual subject and that pictorial symbols should be simple and clear. The author lists some software packages that allow flexibility and speed in flow charting. As a tool for discovering redundancies and inefficiencies, the flow chart is a valuable method for refining quality systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P L Spath. Flow charting for quality improvement.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-1474.1991.tb00197.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Leadership and change processes in hospitals].

BACKGROUND: Successful change processes in hospitals require leaders with strong competence and personal suitability, who can develop resource efficient and creative solutions. We have investigated how division leaders handle change processes and solve problems that arise in cross-disciplinary meeting activities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight division leaders at two hospitals in the same region of Norway have gone through in-depth interviews about change leadership. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATIONS: Some of the division leaders were familiar with facilitating change processes and used a range of methods and tools, but the majority had limited insight into which methods would be most appropriate in the various phases of a change process. They signalised that the most difficult challenge was to handle interactions dominated by suspicion, negative interpretation, assumptions and hidden agendas. Such interplays were the most limiting factor in the development of a common understanding of demands, goals and commitment to change processes across departments and units.

Hospital Administration↗