Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10104389

Documenting concurrent clinical pharmacy interventions.

Abstract

The documentation of clinical pharmacy activities is an important issue and the authors describe a relatively simple and easily implemented method of documenting concurrent clinical pharmacy interventions. This quality assurance measure was added to the quality assurance calendar of a tertiary care medical center/teaching hospital to: (1) document to the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations that the pharmacy department is involved in direct patient care, and (2) demonstrate to hospital administrators that pharmacists are an integral and necessary component of the health care team. At least 115 of 428 (27%) documented interventions during 1988 prevented patients from suffering potentially serious side effects and adverse drug reactions. Physicians and nurses initiated consultations by contacting pharmacists, either by phone or in person, and asking them to: (1) recommend dosages for renally impaired patients; (2) monitor patients receiving medications such as aminoglycosides, digoxin, and phenytoin; (3) suggest appropriate doses for specific indications; (4) recommend a formulary drug for a specific condition; and (5) provide drug information. Pharmacists initiated consultations by contacting physicians and nurses, either by phone or in person, to clarify an order or make recommendations regarding drug therapy. Nurses, pharmacists, and physicians initiated 37%, 33%, and 30% of the clinical interventions, respectively. Most of the physician (89%) and nurse (82%) initiated interventions were requests for drug information, whereas most of the pharmacist initiated interventions were order clarifications (51%). The daily documentation of clinical pharmacy interventions demonstrated that the quality of patient care and patient outcome was improved and served as an effective method of cost-justifying pharmacist positions in this era of fiscal constraints.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T M Haslett, B G Kay, H Weissfellner. 1990. Documenting concurrent clinical pharmacy interventions.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10104389/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Concurrent care.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Concurrent Review↗

How to minimize inappropriate utilization of Accident and Emergency Departments: improve the validity of classifying the general practice cases amongst the A&E attendees.

Studies have found that one-third to two-thirds of all patients attending Accident and Emergency (A and E) Departments could be managed appropriately by general practitioners (GPs). There is also evidence that referral to GPs can be acceptable to patients. The question of primary concern is screening non-urgent cases with high degrees of sensitivity (S), specificity (SP), and positive predictive value (PPV). This paper reports the findings of the validity (S, SP and PPV) of nurses and patients in triaging A and E visitors. A cross sectional study was conducted over a 1 year period and subjects were randomly selected from four A and E Departments located across the four principle geographic regions of Hong Kong by stratified, two-stage sampling. S, SP and PPVs were computed for both non-weighted and weighted conditions. The gold standard for defining the true urgency status of each selected patient was based on a review of the patient's record 3-21 days (or longer if necessary) following the A and E visit. The record review in each A and E was blinded and done independently by a panel of two (and if disagreement existed, three) senior emergency physicians who did not practice in the same hospital. The greatest weights would be for incorrect decisions with greatest impact on patients' well being. The most accurate unweighted nurses' triage classification had an average sensitivity of 87.8%, specificity of 83.9%, and a PPV of 70.1%. When weighted, the average sensitivity reduced to 75%, specificity to 65.7%, and PPV to 54%. The most accurate unweighted patients' self-triage classification yielded a sensitivity of 62.5%, specificity of 69.2%, and a PPV of 58.1%, and correspondingly reduced to 43.3, 49.2 and 38.6% if weights were applied. Validity of the derived patients' self-classifications was too inaccurate for practical use. Hong Kong's current use of a five-point urgency scale by nurses would be further refined for identifying non-urgent visitors. If a mechanism was put in place for additional screening on visitors with a borderline semi-urgent or non-urgent status, the nurses could safely reassign non-urgent patients to GP care. If implemented, a significant impact on hospital costs could be realized.

Concurrent Review↗