subject

Prosthesis-Related Infections

Prosthesis-Related Infections: explore 3 source-linked works published from 2026 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: pubmed. Collection updated 2026-09-17. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

PubMed2026

Antibiotic-impregnated bone graft to prevent infection after total hip arthroplasty (ABOGRAFT): protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Studies have shown promising results using bone graft as a carrier for local administration of antibiotics to reduce the risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The objective of this clinical trial is to determine if tobramycin and vancomycin-impregnated bone graft is safe and effective in reducing the rate of PJI after total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is an international, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical drug trial. Patients scheduled for THA (n=1100) requiring bone grafting (excluding revisions due to an ongoing infection) are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to prophylactic treatment with tobramycin and vancomycin or placebo-impregnated bone graft.The primary outcome is the time to reoperation due to infection or diagnosis of PJI, expressed as a relative risk difference between the two groups. A risk reduction of at least 50% is considered clinically relevant. Secondary outcomes are time to and reason for reoperation and implant revision, type of micro-organism and antibiotic susceptibility pattern within 2 and 5 years after surgery. Safety outcomes are the number of adverse events and revision rate due to aseptic loosening. The primary analysis will be performed using proportional hazard models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved under the Clinical Trial Regulation No 536/2014 (EU CT; 2024-510921-25-00). Results will be published in open-access peer-reviewed journals and disseminated to patient organisations and the media, and de-identified individual participant data will be curated and shared on reasonable request in accordance with the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reuse principles, subject to the laws and regulations governing data protection in each participating country. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05169229.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Factors associated with periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to systematically evaluate factors associated with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and thereby to provide evidence-based references for clinical prevention and perioperative risk stratification. METHODS: Computerized searches were conducted in the following databases from their inception until May 26, 2025: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed study quality. The methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Quantitative synthesis was performed when at least two studies reported comparable exposure definitions and sufficient comparator information; otherwise, narrative synthesis was used. Review Manager 5.4 software was used for the primary analysis. This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251079339). RESULTS: A total of 25 observational studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which 24 contributed to the primary quantitative synthesis. Quantitatively pooled factors associated with PJI included male sex (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.27-1.51), BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (OR = 5.72, 95% CI 2.65-12.36), prolonged operative time, type 2 diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.09, 95% CI 1.45-3.01), rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 2.64, 95% CI 1.38-5.02), smoking (OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.34-2.04), blood transfusion (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.59-3.25), American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 (OR = 2.73, 95% CI 1.02-7.32), history of hormone therapy (OR = 4.88, 95% CI 2.90-8.22), postoperative urinary tract infection (OR = 3.59, 95% CI 1.15-11.21), intraoperative blood loss >200 ml (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.03-2.22), postoperative drainage tube placement duration ≥24 h (OR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.50-3.32), preoperative anemia (OR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.67-1.99), and combined pulmonary disease (OR = 5.54, 95% CI 1.93-15.96). Age was narratively summarized because its classification differed substantially across studies. CONCLUSION: Multiple demographic, comorbidity-related, and perioperative factors were associated with PJI after TKA. However, because the included studies were observational and clinically heterogeneous, these findings should be interpreted as associations rather than causal effects. Optimization of modifiable factors may help reduce the burden of PJI, but further prospective studies using standardized PJI definitions and adjusted effect estimates are required.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Do wound protectors reduce contamination in total shoulder arthroplasty? A randomized controlled trial.

HYPOTHESIS: Cutibacterium acnes is the most frequent cause of shoulder prosthetic joint infection with skin edges as a source of wound contamination. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if the use of a wound protector device decreases the deep wound bacterial colonization in primary shoulder arthroplasty. The secondary purpose was to assess the effect of device usage on deltopectoral muscle and cephalic vein injury. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial. A total of 100 patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups: a wound protector group and a control group. Five patients withdrew from the study, leaving 48 patients in the wound protector group and 47 controls. Three deep wound culture swabs were taken after final arthroplasty implantation. The surgeon also graded deltoid, pectoralis major, and cephalic vein injury on a 0-3 scale based on modification to the Tscherne classification of soft tissue injury. The primary outcome of this study was positive culture results for C acnes. Secondary outcomes included total bacterial culture positivity as well as soft tissue injury grades. A subanalysis removing likely contaminant positive cultures (growth >7 days and 1 colony only) was also performed. Comparisons between groups were made using Fisher exact test for categorical outcomes and t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables. RESULTS: The use of a wound protector did not result in any significant differences compared with controls in the rate of positive cultures for C acnes (15% vs. 21%, P = .593) or all bacteria (15% vs. 26%, P = .304). Removing likely contaminant positive cultures did not demonstrate any significant difference in culture positivity (9% vs. 17%, P = .355, for C acnes; 9% vs. 19%, P = .231, for all bacterial species). The wound protector group had better soft tissue injury scores for the deltoid muscle (P < .001) and pectoralis muscle (P < .001). No difference in cephalic vein injury was noted between the 2 groups (P > .05). No difference in surgical time was noted. CONCLUSION: The use of a surgical wound protector device in total shoulder arthroplasty did not significantly decrease bacterial colonization of the deep wound. However, soft tissue damage to the deltoid and pectoralis muscle was less severe in the wound protector group. These findings suggest that this device reduces iatrogenic soft tissue injury.

Humans↗

Compare source metadata on this page

Work	Published	Source identifier	Source
Antibiotic-impregnated bone graft to prevent infection after total hip arthroplasty (ABOGRAFT): protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.	2026-09-11	PMID 42731828	pubmed
Factors associated with periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.	2026-09-04	PMID 42696160	pubmed
Do wound protectors reduce contamination in total shoulder arthroplasty? A randomized controlled trial.	2026-05-11	PMID 42119939	pubmed

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.