Search PubMedSearch

subject

Pleural Effusion

Pleural Effusion: explore 2 source-linked works published from 2026 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: pubmed. Collection updated 2026-09-16. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

Exploratory proteomic and metabolomic profiling of pleural effusions identifies histone H4 and alanine as promising complementary markers for pleural tuberculosis.

The diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis (Pl-TB) remains challenging. Histopathological analysis and pathogen detection in pleural biopsies are informative but limited. We investigated differentially expressed proteins and metabolites in pleural effusions from patients with Pl-TB, malignancies, and other pathologies. A proteomic analysis of pooled pleural effusions identified 45 proteins exclusively detected or upregulated in Pl-TB samples, many linked to infectious processes. Conversely, 18 proteins were uniquely found or upregulated in malignant pleural effusions, mainly associated with detoxification and hemostasis. To validate these findings, we employed targeted proteomics in individual samples. Eight proteins were validated: S100-A9, histone H4, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2, fibrinogen beta chain, ficolin-3, immunoglobulin heavy constant alpha 1, sulfhydryl oxidase 1, and histidine-rich glycoprotein. Additionally, NMR-based metabolomics identified 13 metabolites with differential abundance between Pl-TB and non-TB samples. Notably, N-acetyl-glycoprotein and the branched-chain amino acids, alanine and lysine differed between groups. Proteomic and metabolomic analyses revealed distinct molecular profiles between Pl-TB and non-TB patients, despite intra-group variability. To address this, we applied classification models. Histone H4 and alanine consistently emerged as discriminative features. Overall, this study provides novel insights into the molecular landscape of Pl-TB. The combined quantification of proteins and metabolites may improve differential diagnosis, although should be further validated in larger, independent cohorts before clinical application.

Humans

Diagnostic performance of machine learning models for malignant and non-malignant pleural effusion: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Accurately distinguishing malignant pleural effusion (MPE) from non-malignant pleural effusion is clinically important, but the generalisability and methodological quality of machine-learning (ML) models remain uncertain. METHODS: We searched eight databases to 23 April 2026. Diagnostic performance was pooled using random-effects and Reitsma bivariate models, and study quality was assessed using PROBAST+AI. RESULTS: Forty-two studies were included; 17 contributed to the AUC meta-analysis and 14 to the bivariate analysis. The pooled AUC was 0.90 (95 % CI 0.85-0.94; 95 % prediction interval 0.62-0.98), with sensitivity of 0.80 (95 % CI 0.77-0.83) and specificity of 0.87 (95 % CI 0.79-0.92). Only nine studies reported external, temporal or independent validation. Externally validated studies had a lower pooled AUC than studies without external validation (0.83 vs 0.92), with lower specificity observed in the two externally validated studies contributing sensitivity and specificity data. All 42 development assessments had high overall quality concerns, and all 42 model evaluations were judged at high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: ML models showed good apparent accuracy for distinguishing MPE from non-MPE, but the evidence was limited by substantial heterogeneity, high risk of bias and scarce external validation. The pooled estimates reflect the average performance of different selected models rather than the expected accuracy of a single clinical test. ML models should be regarded as adjuncts to existing diagnostic pathways until they are confirmed by rigorous multicentre prospective external validation and clinical-impact studies.

Humans
Compare source metadata on this page

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.