Search PubMed⌕ Search

subject

Plasmodium falciparum

Plasmodium falciparum: explore 2 source-linked works published from 2026 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: pubmed. Collection updated 2026-09-16. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

PubMed2026

Signal recognition particle 14 binds to importin α in Plasmodium falciparum.

BACKGROUND: The eukaryotic signal recognition particle (SRP) consists of six proteins and one SRP RNA. This ribonucleoprotein complex assembles inside the nucleus. Nucleocytoplasmic transport is an essential process for the biogenesis of signal recognition particles (SRPs) as well as for the survival of a cell. There are studies on cells that indicate the import receptor is responsible for import of SRP proteins into nucleus, but there is a lack of evidence that SRP proteins directly bind with import receptors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Coding sequences of SRP 14 and importin α were amplified from synthesized cDNA and genomic DNA, respectively, of Plasmodium falciparum cultivated in vitro culture. The amplified products were cloned and expressed in E. coli, followed by purification. A binding study was conducted on glutathione-agarose as well as in a 96-well plate format at different concentrations of SRP 14 with immobilized importin α. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of direct binding between importin α and a eukaryotic signal recognition particle 14 (SRP 14). A cost-effective 96-well plate-based assay has also been developed to study the binding of cargoes of importin α.

Plasmodium falciparum↗
PubMed2026

Malaria rapid diagnostic tests: performance, pitfalls, and progress.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have revolutionized malaria diagnosis in endemic settings. RDTs are simple to use and accurate for clinical cases, although sensitivity is reduced at parasite densities below 200 parasites/μl. However, increasing prevalence of hrp2/3 gene deletions in certain areas threaten utility of histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)-based RDTs, and lingering HRP2 antigenemia can generate false-positive results after parasite clearance. This review summarizes current performance of malaria RDTs, threats to their validity, and recent innovations to improve their performance and continued role in malaria diagnosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Most World Health Organization (WHO) prequalified RDTs perform well for clinical diagnosis, with only occasional exceptions, including a recently reported issue affecting several countries. RDT sensitivity is generally related to malaria transmission intensity, with higher proportions of false-negative results in lower-transmission areas. Newly prequalified lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH)-based RDTs perform well for both Plasmodium falciparum in areas with >5% hrp2/3 gene deletions and for Plasmodium vivax diagnosis. Several point-of-care alternatives to RDTs, including micro-fluidic devices, hemozoin-detecting devices, and automated hematology analyzers, have shown promising results in small studies, but require larger-scale trials before widespread use. SUMMARY: RDTs remain a critical tool in clinical diagnosis of malaria, and newer pLDH-based tests perform well in areas where hrp2/3 gene deletions threaten validity of HRP2-based RDTs.

Humans↗
Compare source metadata on this page
WorkPublishedSource identifierSource
Signal recognition particle 14 binds to importin α in Plasmodium falciparum.2026-09-08PMID 42709283pubmed
Malaria rapid diagnostic tests: performance, pitfalls, and progress.2026-08-05PMID 42566706pubmed

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.