Search PubMedSearch

subject

Plasma

Plasma: explore 2 source-linked works published from 2026 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: pubmed. Collection updated 2026-09-16. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

Determination of 13 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in human plasma samples using LC-MS/MS: application to capillary microsamples.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are chemicals widely applied in industrial processes and highly persistent in the environment, whose extensive use has been linked to adverse health effects. Venous plasma is the conventional matrix for PFAS assessment in blood, and LC-MS/MS is the most used quantification technique. Despite the relevance of this topic, biomonitoring data on human exposure to PFAS in Brazil remain limited. This study validated an LC-MS/MS method for determination of 13 PFAS in human plasma. Blood samples were collected from volunteers by phlebotomy, followed by protein precipitation with acetonitrile containing 1% formic acid (v/v) and solid-phase extraction. Chromatographic separation was achieved on an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column. The assay was linear over a calibration range of 0.2-20 ng/mL. Intra- and inter-assay precision (CV%) were within the ranges of 2.06-12.0% and 0.25-10.7%, respectively. As for accuracy, results were 89.0-112.9%. Matrix effect ranged from -1.31 to 0.05%. Stability after four freeze/thaw cycles and under autosampler conditions were also confirmed for all analytes. The method was applied to 40 paired venous and capillary plasma samples. Both measures exhibited high correlation (r = 0.926). PFOS was the only compound detected at concentrations ≥0.2 ng/mL (LLOQ) in all samples, with capillary plasma concentrations of 0.85-13.50 ng/mL. In summary, the method showed good validation performance and demonstrated the suitability of capillary plasma samples as an alternative matrix for PFAS quantification.

Humans

Plasma proteomic profiling characterizes candidate biomarkers of perimesencephalic non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

OBJECT: This study aims to explore the plasma proteomic profiles of angiographically confirmed pmSAH and aSAH, and to identify candidate protein biomarkers for discriminating these subtypes on a biological level. METHODS: The differentially abundant proteins of plasma samples from patients with pmSAH (n = 30) and aSAH (n = 30) were analyzed by data-independent acquisition proteomics, and candidate biomarkers were screened. RESULTS: 291 candidate biomarkers were obtained that could be used to distinguish pmSAH patients from aSAH patients, among which 76 were upregulated and 215 were downregulated in pmSAH. Subsequently, the 10 candidate biomarkers were validated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in a validation cohort of 72 subjects. ORM1, ORM2, HP and NMNAT1 were specifically down-regulated in the pmSAH group, while ANP32A was specifically up-regulated in the pmSAH group. FGL2 was specifically up-regulated in the aSAH group. The combined model of ORM2, HP and ANP32A had the best discriminative power (AUC = 0.880). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified ORM2, HP, and ANP32A as candidate biomarkers reflecting biological differences between pmSAH and aSAH. SIGNIFICANCE: Although some proteomic studies have analyzed aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, to date, there have been no reports on the circulating proteomic analysis of pmSAH. Comparative analysis of the circulating proteomic differences between pmSAH and aSAH may not only help understand the causes of pmSAH, but also contribute to a deeper understanding of mechanisms showing how pmSAH differs from the formation and rupture mechanisms of intracranial aneurysms.

Humans
Compare source metadata on this page

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.