subject

Cross-sectional study

Cross-sectional study: explore 3 source-linked works published from 2026 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: pubmed. Collection updated 2026-09-15. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

PubMed2026

Association between hepatic steatosis index and female infertility: a cross-sectional study using NHANES 2013-2018.

Female infertility is a major reproductive health concern. Hepatic steatosis index (HSI), a non-invasive marker of liver-related metabolic burden, has not been well studied in relation to infertility across its distribution. We analyzed women aged 20-49 years from three NHANES cycles (2013-2018). HSI was examined as both a continuous variable and in quartiles, and restricted cubic spline models were used to assess potential nonlinearity. Sensitivity analyses using alternative infertility definitions and exploratory interaction analyses were also performed. Among 3,007 women, 416 (13.8%) were classified as having infertility. In the fully adjusted model, women in the highest HSI quartile had higher odds of infertility than those in the lowest quartile (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.08-2.57; P = 0.031), with a significant trend across quartiles (P for trend = 0.010). Restricted cubic spline analysis showed a nonlinear association between HSI and infertility (P for overall association = 0.005), which was more evident at higher HSI levels. Higher HSI was associated with greater odds of infertility among reproductive-aged women.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Association between cumulative social disadvantage, as measured by the social determinants of health score, and epilepsy: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDoH) shape access to care, health behaviors, and long-term outcomes, yet their cumulative relationship with epilepsy has not been well quantified. This study examined whether a composite SDoH score was associated with epilepsy in adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2018. The SDoH score ranged from 0 to 8 and summarized eight unfavorable social conditions. Epilepsy was identified using medication-based ascertainment. Survey-weighted logistic regression models were applied to evaluate the association between SDoH score and epilepsy. Restricted cubic spline, subgroup, sensitivity, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 13,119 participants were included, of whom 114 had epilepsy. Participants with epilepsy had a higher mean SDoH score than those without epilepsy (3.41 ± 0.24 vs. 2.35 ± 0.06, P < 0.001). In the fully adjusted model, each 1-point increase in SDoH score was associated with 31% higher odds of epilepsy (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.48). Compared with the low-score group (0-2), the adjusted odds ratios were 2.09 (95% CI 1.06-4.15) for scores of 3-5 and 2.67 (95% CI 1.34-5.33) for scores of 6-8. Spline analysis showed a significant overall association without evidence of nonlinearity. Adding SDoH components to demographic variables improved model discrimination (AUC 0.731 vs. 0.589, P for difference <0.001). CONCLUSION: Greater cumulative social disadvantage, as reflected by the SDoH score, was associated with higher odds of epilepsy.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Association of Age at Menarche With Depression in Adulthood in NHANES 2015-2023: A Cross-Sectional Study.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study is to elucidate the role of age at menarche in depression in adulthood and explore the implications of this association. METHODS: We conducted a study involving 9,826 adult female participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2015 and August 2023. Age at menarche was categorized as early (<12 years), normal (12-14 years), or late (≥15 years). Depression was assessed using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and clinical diagnoses. Logistic regression and restricted cubic spline analyses were performed to address the study objectives. In addition, subgroup analyses were conducted based on demographic, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The depression group had a significantly higher proportion of young adults (aged 18-30 years) compared to the nondepression group (26.46% vs. 20.52%, p < .001). Conversely, the nondepression group included a greater proportion of older adults (over 60 years) than the depression group (29.53% vs. 23.98%, p < .001). After comprehensive adjustments, early menarche was significantly associated with increased depression risk (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.224, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.003-1.493, p = .047). Restricted cubic spline analyses revealed an L-shaped nonlinear pattern (p for nonlinearity = 0.006), with optimal age at menarche around 12 years. Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent associations without significant interactions. DISCUSSION: Early menarche is linked to increased depression risk, especially among women aged 18-30 years. Menarche at 12 years may serve as a key point for early intervention to prevent depression in young women.

Humans↗

Compare source metadata on this page

Work	Published	Source identifier	Source
Association between hepatic steatosis index and female infertility: a cross-sectional study using NHANES 2013-2018.	2026-09-01	PMID 42677464	pubmed
Association between cumulative social disadvantage, as measured by the social determinants of health score, and epilepsy: a cross-sectional study.	2026-08-13	PMID 42594578	pubmed
Association of Age at Menarche With Depression in Adulthood in NHANES 2015-2023: A Cross-Sectional Study.	2026-08-07	PMID 42563620	pubmed

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.