Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Z Blanck

Publications and source records attributed to Z Blanck.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Sensing failure in a tiered therapy implantable cardioverter defibrillator: role of auto adjustable gain.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators have an established role in the management of life-threatening tachyarrhythmias. These devices use sophisticated sensing circuitry to detect and promptly treat a vast majority of these arrhythmias. However, they are not foolproof. We report one case where the device failed to sense every other QRS complex during induced ventricular fibrillation due to marked electrical alterans. Thus, undersensing can be a potentially fatal problem despite the use of auto adjustable gain.

Aged↗

Catheter ablation of the left bundle branch for the treatment of sustained bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia.

Sustained Bundle Branch Reentrant VT. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the left bundle branch (LBB) was attempted in a patient with sustained bundle branch reentry. During sinus rhythm, the QRS had a complete LBB block pattern, and the LBB was activated retrogradely (transseptal). Ablation of the LBB eliminated inducibility of the tachycardia, while the QRS complex and the duration of the HV interval (70 msec) remained unchanged. Successful ablation of the LBB eliminated bundle branch reentry and yet maintained the anterograde conduction properties of the His-Purkinje system, obviating implantation of a permanent pacemaker.

Aged↗

Posteroseptal accessory pathways: an overview of anatomical characteristics, electrocardiographic patterns, electrophysiological features, and ablative therapy.

First, the posteroseptal region of the heart is probably the most complex area among those that harbor AV accessory fibers and a firm grasp of the anatomical characteristics of this region may facilitate achieving a successful AP ablation. Second, there is no sharp demarcation between the posteroseptal area and its surrounding regions including mid-septal, left posterior paraseptal, and right posterior paraseptal locations. Therefore, there are some inevitable overlaps between the electrocardiographic and electrophysiological features of APs located in the posteroseptal region and those areas immediately adjacent to it. Third, in the vast majority of cases, successful ablation can be achieved using a right atrial approach. Therefore, dividing posteroseptal APs into right- or left-sided pathways may only be useful for describing their ECG or electrophysiological characteristics with little or no value in predicting the site of successful ablation. Fourth, it seems advisable to attempt efforts to induce functional bundle branch block during orthodromic tachycardia and assess its effect on the VA interval. Ventriculoatrial interval prolongation due to right bundle branch block strongly favors a right free-wall or anteroseptal AP location. Prolongation of the VA interval by 30 msec or less in response to left bundle branch block is compatible with a posteroseptal location. In this situation, the mapping and ablative efforts should primarily be focused on the right atrial approach, including the terminal coronary sinus. If left bundle branch block causes VA interval lengthening of 30 msec or greater, the AP is most likely in the left free-wall region, including the posterior paraseptal area. Finally, the presence of APs having an intimate relationship with the middle cardiac (posterior interventricular) vein or the coronary sinus pouch, although exceedingly uncommon, should be considered in difficult cases in which radiofrequency applications to the conventional posteroseptal locations are unsuccessful. Such cases may require coronary sinus venography for better visualization and precise mapping of the terminal sinus complex.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗

Catheter ablation in supraventricular tachycardia.

The evolution of catheter ablation for the treatment of supraventricular tachycardias represents a major advance in the management of cardiac arrhythmias. Excellent results in the majority of patients undergoing the procedure, together with a low rate of early complications and a brief hospitalization, make catheter ablation a highly cost-effective permanent cure. At present, however, its place in relation to alternate therapies in the management of supraventricular tachycardias has not been clearly established owing to unresolved risk-benefit issues. Continuing technical advances will likely enable catheter ablation to be successfully applied to a broader range of cardiac arrhythmias.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

Feasibility of concomitant implantation of permanent transvenous pacemaker and defibrillator systems.

In 17 patients (14 men and 3 women aged 69 +/- 10 years), a transvenous pacemaker was implanted before (8 patients), following (7 patients), or simultaneously (2 patients) with the insertion of a transvenous defibrillator. Indications included malignant ventricular arrhythmias and symptomatic bradycardia in all patients. All patients had structural heart disease. All pacemakers were non-programmable bipolar, either single chamber (n = 7) or dual chamber (n = 10). Eleven pacemakers were rate responsive. The Transvene system was implanted in 7 patients (Pacer-Cardioverter-Defibrillator in 6 patients and the Cadence defibrillator in 1). The Endotak lead system was implanted in 10 patients (Ventak in 7 patients and the Cadence in 3). The mean defibrillation threshold was 16 +/- 5 J. Repositioning of the pacemaker leads eliminated undersensing of ventricular fibrillation by the defibrillator, which occurred during asynchronous pacing in 2 patients. During a mean follow-up of 11 +/- 6 months, 2 patients died because of pump failure and 7 patients received defibrillator therapy for ventricular arrhythmias. No significant complications were noted. Successful concomitant implantation of transvenous pacemakers and defibrillators was thus accomplished in 17 patients, which suggests that insertion of a second transvenous device can be safely accomplished.

Adult↗

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

The role and success rate of catheter ablation for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) depend on the mechanism and origin of the tachycardia (i.e., myocardial versus His-Purkinje system) and whether it occurs in the presence or absence of structural heart diseases. For sustained bundle-branch reentry, a form of VT associated with structural heart disease, radiofrequency catheter ablation of the right bundle-branch can be performed readily and is highly successful in eliminating this arrhythmia. Because of modest success rates of catheter ablation of VT associated with a prior infarction (between 17% and 75%), this treatment modality is usually considered for cases refractory to drug therapy and should be viewed as adjunctive therapy. The target for ablation is a critical area of slow conduction, which is selected based on earliest endocardial activation, mid-diastolic potentials, concealed entrainment, or pace mapping. Radiofrequency catheter ablation may be the treatment of choice in patients with VT and no apparent structural heart disease; this is especially true for young patients who would otherwise require long-life antiarrhythmic therapy. Success rates between 75% and 100% have been reported, especially when the origin is in the right ventricular outflow tract.

Bundle-Branch Block↗

Efficacy and safety of atrioventricular nodal modification for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the pediatric population.

The safety and efficacy of radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular node for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the pediatric population is described. Twenty-one patients with a mean age of 14.9 +/- 3.6 years underwent slow-pathway atrioventricular nodal modification with a stepwise anatomic approach. The average cumulative fluoroscopy exposure time (22 procedures in 21 patients) inclusive of the electrophysiologic study was 36.1 +/- 22 minutes. Noninducibility of tachycardia was achieved in all patients with one procedural complication (hemothorax). During a mean follow-up of 15 +/- 9.06 months, tachycardia recurred in one patient. Patient and family acceptance and satisfaction with the procedure was high. Because of the curative potential of radiofrequency catheter modification with low associated short- and long-term risks, it may be considered as a primary treatment option in pediatric patients with symptomatic atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Adolescent↗

Slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia and a prolonged PR interval.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of selective slow pathway ablation using radiogfrequency energy and a transcatheter technique in patients with a prolonged PR interval and atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia. BACKGROUND: Although both fast and slow AV node pathways can be ablated in patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia, slow pathway ablation, by obviating the risk of AV block, appears to be safer. However, the safety and efficacy of selective slow pathway ablation using transcatheter radiofrequency energy in patients with a prolonged PR interval during sinus rhythm are unclear. METHODS: The seven study patients with a prolonged PR interval (mean +/- SD 237 +/- 26 ms) comprised three women and four men with a mean age of 31 +/- 15 years. The slow pathway was targeted in all seven patients at the posterior/inferior interatrial septal aspect of the tricuspid annulus. Two patients presented with the uncommon variety of AV node reentrant tachycardia after initial fast pathway ablation; in the remaining five patients, the AV node reentrant tachycardia was of the common variety. RESULTS: A single radiofrequency pulse at 30 W successfully abolished the slow pathway in both the anterograde and the retrograde direction in the two patients with uncommon AV node reentrant tachycardia. A mean of 5 +/- 3 radiofrequency pulses were required in the remaining five patients with reentrant tachycardia of the common variety. The postablation PR interval and AH interval remained unchanged. The shortest cycle length of 1:1 AV conduction was prolonged significantly (from 327 +/- 31 to 440 +/- 59 ms, p < 0.01, as was the AV node effective refractory period (from 244 +/- 35 to 344 +/- 43 ms, p < 0.01). During a mean follow-up interval of 20 +/- 6 months, no patient developed symptoms suggestive of AV node reentrant tachycardia or had evidence of second- or third-degree AV block. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the AV node slow pathway can be ablated in patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia who demonstrate a prolonged PR interval during sinus rhythm.

Adolescent↗

Experience with two different nonthoracotomy systems for implantable defibrillator in 170 patients.

Implantation of a nonthoracotomy system (Medtronic PCD or CPI Endotak) was attempted in 170 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) not requiring concomitant cardiac surgery. A nonthoracotomy system could be successfully implanted in 95 of the 115 patients with the PCD system and 49 of 55 patients receiving the Endotak lead system. In 26 patients with failed nonthoracotomy system because of defibrillation threshold (DFT) > 25 joules (J), an epicardial system was implanted at the same setting. Patients receiving the two lead systems were comparable with regard to age, sex, and ejection fraction. However, since the PCD system offers tiered therapy multiprogrammable options, all attempts were made to implant this lead system in patients with VT that could be pace terminated. Mean DFT (15 +/- 4.7 vs 17 +/- 4.6 J; P = 0.03) and implant time (2.5 +/- 0.6 vs 3.3 +/- 0.7 hours; P = 0.02) were less with the Endotak lead system. There was no perioperative mortality. During a mean follow-up of 20 +/- 4 months, there were eight instances of lead dislodgment in patients receiving the PCD system. There were four nonsudden cardiac deaths and one sudden death in the Endotak group and three nonsudden deaths in the PCD group. Sudden cardiac death and total survival using the intention-to-treat analysis during this follow-up period were 99% and 95%, respectively. In conclusion, successful implantation, perioperative mortality, and survival rate are comparable with both lead systems; however, incorporating two defibrillating electrodes in one lead minimizes lead dislodgment and reduces implant time.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

Ventricular fibrillation and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia with critical coronary artery stenosis: does bypass surgery suffice?

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have suggested that coronary artery bypass surgery is sufficient to prevent recurrence of sudden death in patients with critical coronary artery stenosis presenting with ventricular fibrillation or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. We present our experience in patients with one or more episodes of sudden death associated with documented ventricular fibrillation or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and severe operable coronary artery disease who underwent defibrillator implant at the time of bypass surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients (age 63 +/- 8 years) were included in this study. Eighteen of the 58 patients had no evidence of previous myocardial infarction. The mean ejection fraction was 37 +/- 13%. All patients underwent electrophysiologic study before and after revascularization. At the time of first defibrillator discharge, each patient was reevaluated to exclude the presence of ischemia. The benefits of defibrillator implant were estimated comparing the projected survival based upon defibrillator discharge preceded by syncope or presyncope with survival curves generated including total death and sudden plus cardiac death. After a mean follow-up of 4.6 +/- 2 years, 22 patients received appropriate shocks preceded by syncope or presyncope, and an additional 19 patients received asymptomatic shocks. At 4 years, survival free of total death was 71.2%, and the projected survival was 58.8% (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that ejection fraction lower than 30% and induction of arrhythmia with one or two extrastimuli (S2, S3) were independent predictors for defibrillator discharge. None of the remaining variables including age, gender, number of bypasses, history of myocardial infarction, and type of arrhythmias induced were predictive for death and occurrence of shocks. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ventricular fibrillation and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, bypass surgery does not protect from recurrence of life-threatening arrhythmias, and, as in our population, defibrillator implant may have significant impact on survival.

Adult↗

Ablation of left free-wall accessory pathways using radiofrequency energy at the atrial insertion site: transseptal versus transaortic approach.

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter ablation of the left free-wall atrioventricular accessory pathways (AP) by delivery of radiofrequency current at the ventricular insertion site has been shown to be effective. The efficacy of such a technique targeting the atrial insertion site of the AP was evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients with left free-wall APs and symptomatic supraventricular tachyarrhythmias were included. APs were manifest in 55 patients and concealed in 45. There were 55 men and 45 women with a mean age of 35 years. A total of 107 left free-wall APs were identified in these patients. In these 100 patients, successful ablation was accomplished in all by using a transseptal (45 patients) or transaortic (54 patients) technique. In one patient, ablation was accomplished from within the coronary sinus. Seven patients required a repeat ablative procedure, which was performed successfully. During 107 ablative procedures, six were associated with nonfatal complications including pericardial effusion (hemopericardium) in two patients, mild mitral regurgitation in two patients, swelling of the left arm in one patient, and staphylococcal bacteremia in one patient. Eighty-two (82%) patients underwent a repeat electrophysiologic study 6 to 8 weeks after successful ablation and were found to have no functioning AP or inducible supraventricular tachycardia. During a mean follow-up of 20 +/- 8 months, none of the 100 patients had a recurrence of tachyarrhythmias. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the atrial insertion site of the AP can be successfully ablated in the majority of patients with left free-wall APs by using either a transseptal or transaortic approach. Furthermore, both techniques are associated with minimal morbidity and no mortality.

Adult↗

Transcatheter ablation of posteroseptal accessory pathways using a venous approach and radiofrequency energy.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of transcatheter ablation of atrioventricular (AV) accessory pathways (APs) located in the posteroseptal region using a right atrial approach and radiofrequency energy was evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients with APs in the posteroseptal region underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation. Manifest preexcitation was present in 36 patients and a concealed AP in 14. In 18 patients (group 1), the ventriculoatrial (VA) interval during orthodromic tachycardia was prolonged by 21 +/- 7 milliseconds (range, 10 to 30 milliseconds) with functional left bundle-branch block. In 16 patients (group 2), functional left bundle-branch block caused no VA interval prolongation. The remaining 16 patients (group 3) had no inducible left bundle-branch block during orthodromic tachycardia. Functional right bundle-branch block was induced in 30 patients with no effect on the VA interval. In group 1, of 14 patients with manifest preexcitation during sinus rhythm, 10 patients had a positive delta wave in lead V1. Of 10 group 2 patients with manifest preexcitation, only 5 had a positive delta wave in lead V1. In group 3, of 12 patients with manifest preexcitation, 7 exhibited a positive delta wave in lead V1. All posteroseptal APs were successfully ablated, and this was achieved via a right atrial approach in 48 patients and left ventricular approach in only 2. Successful sites were at the posteroseptal region of the tricuspid annulus (30 patients), within the terminal 1 cm of the coronary sinus including its ostium (16 patients), and at the inferomedial aspect of the right atrium posterior to the coronary sinus ostium (2 patients). The posteroseptal region of the left ventricle was the site of successful ablation in 2 patients. Six patients with a recurrence of AP conduction required a repeat ablation, with successful results in 5. Thirty-five patients had a complete electrophysiological evaluation 2 to 3 months after their successful ablation and were found to have no functioning AP. In 49 patients with a final successful ablation, no recurrence of symptoms was noted during a mean follow-up period of 12 +/- 9 months. Complications occurring in 3 patients were cardiac tamponade requiring surgical drainage and repair of a right ventricular tear, pericardial effusion with no hemodynamic consequence that spontaneously resolved, and a transient 2:1 atrioventricular block. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that posteroseptal APs are amenable to successful ablation using a right atrial approach. Success was achieved in 47 cases (94%) in this series even though the ECG and/or electrophysiological characteristics of the posteroseptal APs of some patients were suggestive of "left-sided" pathways.

Adolescent↗

Bundle branch reentry: a mechanism of ventricular tachycardia in the absence of myocardial or valvular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present bundle branch reentry as the mechanism of sustained ventricular tachycardia in the absence of myocardial or valvular dysfunction. BACKGROUND: Previous reports have documented the relation between structural heart disease and bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia. Myocardial or valvular dysfunction has thus far been recognized as the only anatomic substrate for the development of this tachycardia. METHODS: Three patients with a wide QRS complex tachycardia underwent noninvasive and invasive cardiac evaluation and electrophysiologic studies to identify the substrate and mechanism of tachycardia. Catheter ablation of the right bundle branch using radiofrequency current was performed in each patient. RESULTS: The patients were all men (aged 54, 34 and 72 years) who presented with presyncope, palpitation and cardiac arrest, respectively. Electrocardiography during sinus rhythm revealed nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay in all three patients. Cardiac evaluation revealed no evidence of myocardial or valvular dysfunction in any patient. The baseline HV interval was prolonged in each patient (90, 100 and 75 ms, respectively). Programmed right ventricular stimulation initiated bundle branch reentrant tachycardia with typical left (three patients) and right (one patient) bundle branch block pattern. Catheter ablation of the right bundle branch using radiofrequency current abolished bundle branch reentry in all three patients. After 26-, 13- and 8-month follow-up periods, complete right bundle branch block persisted, and all three patients remained asymptomatic without antiarrhythmic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained bundle branch reentry can be a clinical arrhythmia in patients with no identifiable myocardial or valvular dysfunction except for isolated conduction abnormalities in the His-Purkinje system. This mechanism of tachycardia should be recognized during electrophysiologic evaluation, given the seriousness of this arrhythmia and the availability of the effective treatment.

Adult↗

Comparison of cardiac pacing with drug therapy in the treatment of neurocardiogenic (vasovagal) syncope with bradycardia or asystole.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of permanent cardiac pacing in patients with neurocardiogenic (or vasovagal) syncope associated with bradycardia or asystole is not clear. We compared the efficacy of cardiac pacing with that of oral drug therapy in the prevention of hypotension and syncope during head-up tilt testing. METHODS: Among 70 patients with a history of syncope in whom hypotension and syncope could be provoked during head-up tilt testing, 22 had bradycardia (a heart rate < 60 beats per minute, with a decline in the rate by at least 20 beats per minute) or asystole along with hypotension during testing. There were 9 men and 13 women, with a mean (+/- SD) age of 41 +/- 17 years. Head-up tilt testing was repeated during atrioventricular sequential pacing (in 20 patients with sinus rhythm) or ventricular pacing (in 2 patients with atrial fibrillation). Regardless of the results obtained during artificial pacing, all the patients subsequently had upright-tilt testing repeated during therapy with oral metoprolol, theophylline, or disopyramide. RESULTS: During the initial tilt test, 6 patients had asystole and 16 had bradycardia along with hypotension. Despite artificial pacing, the mean arterial pressure during head-up tilt testing still fell significantly, from 97 +/- 19 to 57 +/- 19 mm Hg (P < 0.001); 5 patients had syncope, and 15 had presyncope. By contrast, 19 patients who later received only medical therapy (metoprolol in 10, theophylline in 3, and disopyramide in 6), 2 patients who received both metoprolol and atrioventricular sequential pacing, and 1 patient who received only atrioventricular sequential pacing had negative head-up tilt tests. After a median follow-up of 16 months, 18 of the 19 patients who were treated with drugs alone (94 percent) remained free of recurrent syncope or presyncope, whereas the patient treated only with permanent dual-chamber pacemaker had recurrent syncope. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with neurocardiogenic syncope associated with bradycardia or asystole, drug therapy is often effective in preventing syncope, whereas artificial pacing is not.

Adolescent↗

Ventricular tachycardia due to sustained bundle branch reentry: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations.

We have identified bundle-branch reentry (BBR) as the mechanism of ventricular tachycardia (VT) during electrophysiologic studies in 48 patients at our institution. All but three patients had significant structural heart disease, that is, dilated ischemic or idiopathic cardiomyopathy, the most common of anatomic substrates. Syncope and sudden death were the modes of presentation in up to 70% of these patients. The critical prerequisite for the development of this arrhythmia is conduction delay in the His-Purkinje system, which was present in all patients and manifests as a nonspecific conduction delay or a left bundle-branch block (LBBB) in the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) and a prolonged HV interval in the intracardiac recordings. VT with an LBBB morphology is the most common form of BBR, present in 98% of patients. Transcatheter ablation of the right bundle branch (RBB) with the use of radiofrequency current is the treatment of choice, as it effectively eliminates BBR. During long-term follow-up, recurrent tachycardia due to BBR was not documented in any patient; however, congestive heart failure was a common cause of death in this population.

Bundle of His↗

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator for prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation: ICD therapy in sudden cardiac death.

Among the various therapy options for survivors of ventricular tachycardia-ventricular fibrillation (VT-VF), the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) seems most promising. It reliably terminates VT-VF and thus significantly impacts sudden cardiac death (SCD) survival. It is more effective than any of the known antiarrhythmic drugs in prevention of SCD, particularly among survivors of cardiac arrest. Compared to VT surgery, the ICD therapy can be offered to a larger pool of patients and can be placed at a lower surgical risk. With proper patient selection, ICD therapy is of major benefits to its recipients since it markedly reduces the chances of VT-VF related mortality; the main cause of premature death in this population. The ICD therapy is cost effective when compared to other medical interventions and could be more so if the implant is carried out early in the course of VT-VF management.

Death, Sudden, Cardiac↗