Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Yusuf Khan

Publications and source records attributed to Yusuf Khan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The ABJS Nicolas Andry Award: Tissue engineering of bone and ligament: a 15-year perspective.

Musculoskeletal repair is a major challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. The burden of repair is compounded by supply constraints and morbidity associated with autograft and allograft tissue. We report 15 years of research regarding tissue engineering and biological substitutes for bone and ligaments. Our approach has focused on biomaterial selection, scaffold development, cell selection, cell/material interaction, and growth factor delivery. We have extensively tested poly(ester), poly(anhydride), poly(phosphazene) derivatives, and composite materials using biocompatibility, degradation, and mechanical analyses for bone and ligament tissue engineering. We have developed novel three-dimensional matrices with a pore structure and mechanical properties similar to native tissue. We also have reported on the attachment, growth, proliferation, and differentiation of cells cultured on several scaffolds. Through extensive molecular analysis, in vitro culture condition analysis, and in vivo evaluation, our findings provide new methods of bone tissue regeneration using three-dimensional tissue engineered scaffolds, bioactive bone cement composite materials, and three-dimensional tissue engineered scaffolds for ligament regeneration.

Animals↗

Bone graft substitutes.

The current gold standard of bone grafts is the autograft since it possesses all the characteristics necessary for new bone growth, namely osteoconductivity, osteogenicity and osteoinductivity. However, the autograft has its limitations, including donor-site morbidity and supply limitations, hindering this as an option for bone repair. An extensive list of currently available alternatives to bone grafts is provided, along with a classification scheme that divides these bone graft substitutes into five groups depending on the primary material composition: allograft, cell, factor, ceramic and polymer. Of the bone graft substitutes listed, several are discussed in detail. Beyond the current state of the art, attention is paid to what lies ahead in the field of bone graft substitutes. Biodegradable composite structures and various new architectures are discussed, as are newly developed polymeric materials, with tissue engineering providing the platform for future directions within this discipline.

Animals↗

Tissue engineered microsphere-based matrices for bone repair: design and evaluation.

The need for synthetic alternatives to conventional bone grafts is due to the limitations of current grafting materials. Our approach has been to design polymer-based graft substitutes using microsphere technology. The gel microsphere matrix and the sintered microsphere matrix were designed using the random packing of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres to create a three-dimensional porous structure. The evaluation of these methods dealt with analysis of effects of matrix composition and processing. Matrices were evaluated structurally by scanning electron microscopy and porosimetry, and biomechanically by compression testing. The evaluation revealed the high modulus of the gel microsphere matrix and the versatility of the sintered microsphere matrix. The gel microsphere matrix incorporated hydroxyapatite particles and had a Young's modulus of 1651 MPa, but structural analysis through SEM revealed a pore system less optimal for bone in-growth. The sintered microsphere matrices were fabricated without hydroxyapatite particles by thermally fusing polymeric microspheres into a three-dimensional array, possessing interconnectivity and a modulus range of 241 (+/-82)-349 (+/-89) MPa. The sintered microsphere matrix demonstrated a connected pore system and mechanical properties in the mid-range of cancellous bone. Porosimetry data indicated that matrix pore diameter varied directly with microsphere diameter, while pore volume was independent of microsphere diameter in the range of diameters examined. The microsphere-based matrices show promise as polymeric substitutes for bone repair.

Bone Regeneration↗