Biomedical subjects

Yung-Yang Lin

Publications and source records attributed to Yung-Yang Lin.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Differential effects of stimulus intensity on peripheral and neuromagnetic cortical responses to median nerve stimulation.

To study the differential effects of tactile stimulus intensity on cortical and peripheral responses, we measured neuromagnetic cortical responses, compound muscle action potentials (CMAP), sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP), and the subjective estimation of tactile magnitude to electric median nerve stimulation at the wrist in 13 male healthy adults. The sensory perception threshold (ST) for electric pulses at wrist skin was determined and then various levels of stimulus intensity (1 approximately 6 ST) were given to each subject. At 1 ST, only the P50m components of the primary somatosensory (SI) cortical responses were recorded. The second somatosensory (SII) cortical responses were saturated at 2 ST, while the SI responses reached maximum at 3 ST equivalent to the subjective threshold intensity for "strong" tactility. The CMAP and SNAP were maximum at 4-5 ST. At 2 ST, >70% of maximum SI responses were produced, whereas only <40% of maximum CMAP or SNAP responses were obtained. We concluded that the stimulus intensities for activating or saturating somatosensory cortical responses were lower than those for CMAP and SNAP. The differential intensity effects on cortical and peripheral responses suggest a polysynaptic organization underlying the central amplification for somatosensory cortical activation. The optimal intensity levels for producing maximum SI and SII responses were 3 and 2 ST, respectively. Compared with the SII, the SI plays a crucial role in the coding of the tactile stimulus intensity.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2003

Magnetoencephalographic analysis of bilaterally synchronous discharges in benign rolandic epilepsy of childhood.

The purpose of this study was to examine the spatial and temporal relationship between bilateral foci of bilaterally synchronous discharges in benign rolandic epilepsy of childhood (BREC) using a whole-scalp neuromagnetometer. We simultaneously recorded interictal magnetoencephalographic (MEG) and electroencephalographic (EEG) signals in six children with BREC. Interictal spikes were classified into three groups: bilaterally synchronous discharges (BSDs), unilateral discharges on right side (UD-R), and unilateral discharges on left side (UD-L). We used equivalent current dipole (ECD) modelling to analyse the cortical sources of interictal spikes. Both BSDs and UDs were found in Patients 1-4, whereas only UDs were identified in Patients 5 and 6. The ECDs of interictal spikes were located in rolandic regions, 10-20mm anterior and lateral to hand somatosensory cortices. Multi-dipole analysis of BSDs showed two ECDs in homotopic motor areas of the hemispheres. During BSDs, the right-sided activation preceded the left-sided activation by 15-21 milliseconds in Patients 1 and 2. In Patients 3 and 4, the activation occurred 17-20 milliseconds earlier in the left than the right hemisphere. Within the same hemisphere, the sources of BSDs and UDs were located in similar areas. In conclusion, our results imply the cortical epileptogenicity in bilateral perirolandic areas in BREC. The sequential activation during BSDs in both hemispheres suggest the existence of synaptic connections, possibly via the corpus callosum, between bilateral irritative foci.

Brain Mapping↗

PubMed2003

Neuromagnetic somatosensory responses to natural moving tactile stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the somatosensory cortical responses to natural moving tactile stimulation in adult subjects using magnetoencephalography. METHODS: We measured cortical somatosensory magnetic evoked fields (SEFs) to moving tactile stimuli by a brush over the right thumb once every 1.5 s in seven subjects. Electric SEFs with various intensity or simulated jitter were used for comparison. RESULTS: Tactile SEFs in primary somatosensory cortex (SI) consisted of two deflections: N24mT and P55mT. Electric SEFs consisted of N24mE, P30mE, P40mE, and P55mE. The amplitude of N24mT was only 34% +/- 12% of N24mE, whereas P55mT and P55mE were of about the same size. With increased jitter or decreased intensity, attenuation of electric SEFs was more clearly found in early deflection than late deflection. CONCLUSIONS: Natural moving tactile stimulation produced simpler cortical somatosensory waveforms in comparison with electric SEFs, partly related to less sharp intensity and stimulation jitter with moving tactile stimulation. We propose that of all the afferent fibers conveying the early deflection, the low threshold components participate the generation of the late deflection.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Using electrodiagnostic machine to study movement rhythm variation.

BACKGROUND: Hand movement constitutes the most common daily activities in our life. Hand dexterity is often impaired in patients with neurological disease. We developed an adjunct method, based upon the electrodiagnostic software, for study of motor control and hand dexterity. METHODS: Thirty-two normal subjects, 2 stroke patients and 2 Parkinson patients were included in the study. All of them were right-handed, and were asked to pace rhythmic finger tapping at a comfortable rate without cue or any external stimuli. A trigger kit was designed to transform the finger tapping. After using the triggering mode and adjusting the sweep speed, 2 tapping signals were simultaneously displayed on the screen. The first signal was the triggering potential, and the variation in timing of the second signal represented the variation in timing of the inter-response interval. Twenty sweeps were recorded, superimposed and measured on the screen. Movement rhythm variation (MRV) was defined as b/a x 100 (b = [maximal interval of finger tapping - minimal interval of finger tapping]; a = [maximal interval of finger tapping + minimal interval of finger tapping]/2). Each subject started with right hand and then left hand. RESULTS: MRV measurement showed excellent intrarater (r = 0.97) and interrater (r = 0.97) reliability. In normal right-handed subjects, the MRV was better in right hand than in left hand (right 16.5 +/- 4.1% and left 21.0 +/- 7.6%; p < 0.05). The MRV improved in stroke patients along with the recovery and improved in Parkinson patients after levodopa treatment. CONCLUSIONS: MRV was a good method to provide quantitative data for assessment of hand dexterity. Our study also showed the potential role of MRV in motor control study.

Adult↗