Biomedical subjects

Yuji Uehara

Publications and source records attributed to Yuji Uehara.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Clinical outcomes and genomic features of uncommon EGFR exon 19 deletion subtypes in osimertinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion subtypes may be associated with differential survival outcomes following EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. However, evidence remains scarce, particularly regarding osimertinib, and the underlying biological mechanisms are poorly understood. We aimed to compare survival outcomes among EGFR exon 19 deletion subtypes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with osimertinib. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, patients with NSCLC were stratified according to exon 19 deletion subtypes. Whole-exome sequencing data from the American Association for Cancer Research Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange registry and Memorial Sloan Kettering Clinicogenomic Harmonized Oncologic Real-World Dataset were analyzed to investigate co-occurring genomic alterations. RESULTS: Overall, 111 patients with advanced EGFR exon 19 deletion-positive NSCLC were analyzed and 86.5% received osimertinib as first-line therapy. Patients with non-E746_A750del (n = 25) had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than those with E746_A750del (n = 86) (median: 14.3 vs. 20.6 months; p < 0.05). Among non-E746_A750del subtypes, L747_A750delinsP (n = 4) had a particularly poor prognosis, with significantly worse survival than those with E746_A750del (median PFS: 3.5 vs. 20.6 months; p < 0.001, and median overall survival: 11.8 vs. 48.5 months; p < 0.001). In public database analyses, non-E746_A750del had a higher rate of RBM10 co-mutations, whereas L747_A750delinsP was characterized by frequent CDKN2A/B homozygous deletions and MYC amplifications. CONCLUSIONS: Non-E746_A750del was associated with poorer outcomes, with L747_A750delinsP potentially being a high-risk subtype. Differences in co-occurring genomic alterations may contribute to the prognostic heterogeneity among exon 19 deletion subtypes.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

CD40 transcriptomic expression patterns across malignancies: implications for clinical trials of CD40 agonists.

BACKGROUND: CD40 is a T-cell co-stimulatory receptor targeted by next-generation immunotherapies. We conducted a pan-cancer transcriptome analysis of CD40, its ligand, and related immune markers to evaluate co-expression patterns and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed transcriptome data for CD40, its ligand, and other common checkpoints and co-stimulators (PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA-4, LAG-3, ICOS, CD27, CD28, OX40, and GITR). RNA expression was classified as high (75-100th percentile), moderate (25-74th), or low (0-24th) against a reference population of 735 previously tested solid tumors. RESULTS: Of 514 patients, 114 (22%) showed high, 247 (48%) moderate, and 153 (30%) low CD40 RNA expression. High CD40 expression was most frequent in liver and bile duct (42%), pancreatic (42%), and ovarian (40%) cancers. Both high CD40 and low-moderate CD40 ligand expression-potentially conducive to CD40 agonist therapy-was most frequent in ovarian (33%) and pancreatic (24%) cancer. In both UCSD (N = 514) and TCGA (N = 10,953) cohorts, high CD40 expression significantly correlated with high CD28 and GITR. High CD40 RNA levels were not prognostic for overall survival (OS) from metastatic disease (P = 0.2) (n = 272 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-naïve patients). High CD40 expression correlated with longer OS from immunotherapy initiation (n = 217 ICI-treated patients; P = 0.04, univariable analysis), but not multivariable analysis, suggesting it may not be an independent predictive biomarker. CONCLUSION: High CD40 expression correlated with liver and bile duct, pancreatic, and ovarian cancers, as well as with CD28 and GITR transcripts. Immune marker co-expression in individual patients merits further exploration for the development of CD40-based and other immunotherapy interventions.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Implications of EGFR expression on EGFR signaling dependency and adaptive immunity against EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (EGFRm LUAD), EGFR mutations do not necessarily result in increased EGFR expression (EGFR-exp), which differs among patients. However, the factors influencing EGFR-exp and the impact of EGFR-exp on tumor characteristics in patients with EGFRm LUAD remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Whole-exome and RNA sequencing were performed for patients with early- and advanced-stage EGFRm LUAD. The patients were classified into low or high EGFR-exp groups based on the median transcripts per million. We retrospectively examined the association between EGFR-exp, genomic characteristics, downstream EGFR signaling activity, tumor microenvironment (TME) status, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: This study included 450 and 45 patients in the early- and advanced-stage cohorts, respectively. In both cohorts, the EGFR-exp low group exhibited a lower incidence of TP53 co-mutations and EGFR amplification and a higher incidence of EGFR subclonal mutations than the EGFR-exp high group. Furthermore, downstream EGFR signaling pathways, such as the MAPK signaling, were less activated in the EGFR-exp low group. However, this group showed significantly enriched adaptive immune response pathways (Q < 0.0001) and an immune-inflamed TME. Additionally, a low EGFR-exp was a significantly favorable factor for postoperative relapse (odds ratio [OR], 0.6; P = 0.04). However, in the advanced-stage cohort, a low EGFR-exp was a significant risk factor for non-responders to osimertinib (OR, 17.5; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In EGFRm LUAD, significant associations were observed between EGFR-exp levels and both EGFR signaling pathways and adaptive immune status, which in turn influence clinical outcomes. This large-scale multi-omics analysis highlights the heterogeneity among patients with EGFRm LUAD and emphasizes the need to assess EGFR-exp levels alongside mutation status for optimal treatment strategies in EGFRm LUAD.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 19 insertions: clinical-genomic, preclinical analysis through LC-SCRUM-Asia (multi-institutional genomic screening registry).

BACKGROUND: EGFR exon 19 insertions (EGFRex19ins) are rare EGFR mutations. Their clinical-genomic characteristics and outcomes with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain uncertain. METHODS: We evaluated the clinical-genomic characteristics and outcomes of EGFR-TKIs for EGFRex19ins in the multi-institutional prospective lung cancer genomic screening project (LC-SCRUM-Asia). We also studied preclinical Ba/F3 models expressing EGFR-K745_E746insIPVAIK (Ba/F3-IPVAIK) to investigate their sensitivity to 1st-, 2nd-, 3rd-generation, and EGFR exon 20 insertion-active TKIs. RESULTS: In LC-SCRUM-Asia, 16,204 NSCLC patients were enrolled from March 2015 to December 2023. EGFRex19ins were detected in 13 samples (0.1 % of NSCLC). The median age was 72 years (range, 38-80); most patients were female (77 %), had adenocarcinoma (92 %), and were never-smokers (62 %). Twelve patients (93 %) had EGFR-K745_E746insIPVAIK, while one (7 %) had EGFR-K745_E746insVPVAIK. The most frequent co-mutation was TP53 (62 %); no patients had other driver alterations. Six patients (46 %) tested positive for EGFR exon 19 deletions with PCR-based Cobas EGFR test, likely due to cross-reactivity arising from sequence homology. Twelve patients received EGFR-TKIs; five (42 %) experienced partial response. In the preclinical study, Ba/F3-IPVAIK showed the highest sensitivity to 2nd-generation EGFR-TKIs compared to other EGFR-TKIs. Structural studies supported these consistent results. When broken down by EGFR-TKI generations, response rates for 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-generation TKIs were 50 % (1/2), 80 % (4/5), and 0 % (0/5), respectively. The median PFS for 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-generation TKIs were 8.7 (95 % CI, 7.4-NR), 14.7 (95 % CI, 8.0-NR), and 4.4 (95 % CI, 3.4-NR) months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our preclinical, structural, and clinical findings indicate 2nd-generation EGFR-TKIs are more effective for EGFRex19ins compared to other TKIs.

Adult↗