Biomedical subjects

Yu-Dong Cai

Publications and source records attributed to Yu-Dong Cai.

43 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Support vector machines for the classification and prediction of beta-turn types.

The support vector machines (SVMs) method is proposed because it can reflect the sequence-coupling effect for a tetrapeptide in not only a beta-turn or non-beta-turn, but also in different types of beta-turn. The results of the model for 6022 tetrapeptides indicate that the rates of self-consistency for beta-turn types I, I', II, II', VI and VIII and non-beta-turns are 99.92%, 96.8%, 98.02%, 97.75%, 100%, 97.19% and 100%, respectively. Using these training data, the rate of correct prediction by the SVMs for a given protein: rubredoxin (54 residues. 51 tetrapeptides) which includes 12 beta-turn type I tetrapeptides, 1 beta-turn type II tetrapeptide and 38 non-beta-turns reached 82.4%. The high quality of prediction of the SVMs implies that the formation of different beta-turn types or non-beta-turns is considerably correlated with the sequence of a tetrapeptide. The SVMs can save CPU time and avoid the overfitting problem compared with the neural network method.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

Artificial neural network model for predicting protein subcellular location.

The function of a protein is closely correlated to its subcellular location. Is it possible to utilize a bioinformatics method to predict the protein subcellular location? To explore this problem, proteins are classified into 12 groups (Protein Eng. 12 (1999) 107-118) according to their subcellular location: (1) chloroplast, (2) cytoplasm, (3) cytoskeleton, (4) endoplasmic reticulum, (5) extracellular, (6) Golgi apparatus, (7) lysosome, (8) mitochondria, (9) nucleus, (10) peroxisome, (11) plasma membrane and (12) vacuole. In this paper, the neural network method was proposed to predict the subcellular location of a protein according to its amino acid composition. Results obtained through self-consistency, cross-validation and independent dataset tests are quite high. Accordingly, the present method can serve as a complement tool for the existing prediction methods in this area.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

Prediction of protein structural classes by support vector machines.

In this paper, we apply a new machine learning method which is called support vector machine to approach the prediction of protein structural class. The support vector machine method is performed based on the database derived from SCOP which is based upon domains of known structure and the evolutionary relationships and the principles that govern their 3D structure. As a result, high rates of both self-consistency and jackknife test are obtained. This indicates that the structural class of a protein inconsiderably correlated with its amino and composition, and the support vector machine can be referred as a powerful computational tool for predicting the structural classes of proteins.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed2002

Artificial neural network method for predicting protein secondary structure content.

In this paper, the neural network method was applied to predict the content of protein secondary structure elements that was based on 'pair-coupled amino acid composition', in which the sequence coupling effects are explicitly included through a series of conditional probability elements. The prediction was examined by a self-consistency test and an independent-dataset. Both indicated good results obtained when using the neural network method to predict the contents of alpha-helix, beta-sheet, parallel beta-sheet strand, antiparallel beta-sheet strand, beta-bridge, 3(10)-helix, pi-helix, H-bonded turn, bend, and random coil.

Neural Networks, Computer↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Prediction of membrane protein types by incorporating amphipathic effects.

According to their intramolecular arrangement and position in a cell, membrane proteins are generally classified into the following six types: (1) type I transmembrane, (2) type II transmembrane, (3) multipass transmembrane, (4) lipid chain-anchored membrane, (5) GPI-anchored membrane, and (6) peripheral membrane. Situated in a heteropolar environment, these six types of membrane proteins must have quite different amphiphilic sequence-order patterns in order to stabilize their respective frameworks. To incorporate such a feature into the predictor, the amphiphilic pseudo amino acid composition has been formulated that contains a series of hydrophobic and hydrophilic correlation factors. The success rates thus obtained have been remarkably enhanced in identifying the types of membrane proteins, as demonstrated by the jackknife test and independent data set test, respectively.

Algorithms↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Using functional domain composition to predict enzyme family classes.

According to their main EC (Enzyme Commission) numbers, enzymes are classified into the following 6 main classes: oxidoreductases, transferases, hydrolases, lyases, isomerases, and ligases. A new method has been developed to predict the enzymatic attribute of proteins by introducing the functional domain composition to formulate a given protein sequence. The advantage by doing so is that both the sequence-order-related features and the function-related features are naturally incorporated in the predictor. As a demonstration, the jackknife cross-validation test was performed on a dataset that consists of proteins with only less than 20% sequence identity to each other in order to get rid of any homologous bias. The overall success rate thus obtained was 85% in identifying the enzyme family classes (including the identification of nonenzyme protein sequences as well). The success rate is significantly higher than those obtained by the other methods on such a stringent dataset. This indicates that using the functional domain composition to represent protein samples for statistical prediction is indeed very promising, and will become a powerful tool in bioinformatics and proteomics.

Algorithms↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Predicting enzyme subclass by functional domain composition and pseudo amino acid composition.

As a continuous effort to use the sequence approach to identify enzymatic function at a deeper level, investigations are extended from the main enzyme classes (Protein Sci. 2004, 13, 2857-2863) to their subclasses. This is indispensable if we wish to understand the molecular mechanism of an enzyme at a deeper level. For each of the 6 main enzyme classes (i.e., oxidoreductase, transferase, hydrolase, lyase, isomerase, and ligase), a subclass training dataset is constructed. To reduce homologous bias, a stringent cutoff was imposed that all the entries included in the datasets have less than 40% sequence identity to each other. To catch the core feature that is intimately related to the biological function, the sample of a protein is represented by hybridizing the functional domain composition and pseudo amino acid composition. On the basis of such a hybridization representation, the FunD-PseAA predictor is established. It is demonstrated by the jackknife cross-validation tests that the overall success rate in identifying the 21 subclasses of oxidoreductases is above 86%, and the corresponding rates in identifying the subclasses of the other 5 main enzyme classes are 94-97%. The high success rates imply that the FunD-PseAA predictor may become a useful tool in bioinformatics and proteomics of the post-genomic era.

Amino Acid Sequence↗