Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Y-J Chiang

Publications and source records attributed to Y-J Chiang.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Kidney ultrasound is useful tool in posttransplant follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: Renal sonography has been an important imaging tool in surveys of kidney diseases. We reviewed our experience in the finding and management of asymptomatic patients who underwent renal transplantation. METHODS: We performed baseline graft and native kidney sonography after renal transplantation, as well as annually even if the patient was asymptomatic. At the end of 2004, a total of 326 transplant cases had been annually surveyed. If the findings were positive, they were compared with previous data to determine the need for further examinations and management. RESULTS: The native kidneys of 105 patients were abnormal. Cysts were detected in 71 cases, 23 of which were bilateral. Stones were found in 15 cases. Polycystic kidney disease was identified in 5. The findings in these 91 patients were the same as before. Moderate hydronephrosis was observed in 14 cases. Nine had native ureteral cancer and underwent nephroureterectomy. Ureteral stricture was found in the other 5 patients. Forty-five grafts were abnormal. Thirty-one showed hydronephrosis and 2 underwent ureteral reimplantation. Asymptomatic stones were found in 2. A new single renal cyst was found in 2 cases; and multiple cysts in one other. Elevated RI on color Doppler was discovered in 12 patients, 4 of whom lost their grafts this year. Serum creatinine values of 6.9 and 2.2 mg/dL were observed in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Renal sonography screening is useful not only for the graft but also for the native kidney. Hydronephrosis is an important finding. The high possibility of urothelial malignancy should be expected, requiring further examination and sequential follow-up. Elevated RI is a clue to predict graft outcome; rapid deterioration was observed within months.

Environmental Monitoring↗

Why we consistently use the left donor kidney in living related transplantation: initial experience of right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and comparison with left nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has become the method of choice for removal of living donor kidneys. However, the majority of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy cases have been limited to the left side owing to technical difficulties and renal vessel length. This study described the technique and compared donor outcomes and graft function of right and left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 25 patients, 6 consecutive donors underwent right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy from March 2002 to January 2005. They were compared to 19 patients with left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. We compared operative times, warm ischemia times, serial creatinines, creatinine clearances, complications, and graft function. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in any metric. The operative times (303 min. vs 274 min., P > .05) and warm ischemia times (133 s vs 186 s, P > .05) were similar between right and left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy procedures. In left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, 3 patients had transient brachial plexus neuropathies. No major complication occurred among patients undergoing right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. This study demonstrated that both donor and recipient outcomes are similar for right and left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent use of the left kidney has not affected clinical outcomes. With hand-assisted laparoscopy, the right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is safe, providing excellent graft function.

Adult↗

Preoperative evaluation of living related kidney donor: which kidney to donate?

OBJECTIVES: As the number of cadaveric donor is far beyond the demand of the waiting list, living related kidney transplantation is important for the worldwide organ shortage. Besides, living related transplantation has advantages compared with cadaveric transplantation in terms of graft function and survival. However, the remaining kidney function of the living donor needs to be evaluated. METHODS: We collected 28 paired living kidney donations from March 2003 to March 2005. All patients underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. The preoperative kidney evaluation included renal echography, renal nuclear scan, computed tomography angiography (CTA), and creatinine clearance (CCr). The renal function of the donor kidney was expressed as (donor kidney/both kidneys)%. The percentage renal function from renal echography, renal nuclear scan, and CTA were correlated with CCr. RESULTS: The mean percentage of donor kidney function according to renal echo, nuclear scan, and CTA were 49.77%, 51.83%, and 50.70%, respectively. The correlation coefficients for renal echography, nuclear scan, and CTA to CCr were -0.316, -0.201, and 0.123, respectively. The correlation coefficients for renal echography, nuclear scan, and CTA to postoperative serum creatinine of donor were 0.426, 0.036, and -0.119, respectively. CONCLUSION: From the viewpoint of donor postoperative residual renal function, preoperative renal sonography offered a better predictive value than nuclear scan or CTA.

Adult↗

Silent urothelial cancer detected by sonography after renal transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Organ transplantation increases the incidence of cancer through unclear mechanisms. In our observation, urothelial cancer happens much more frequently in Chinese people. We reviewed the detection of urothelial cancer in our series after renal transplantation. METHODS: From July 1981 to June 2005, we performed 620 renal transplantations. We do graft and native kidney sonography survey annually even if the patient is asymptomatic. During this period, 10 urothelial tumors were detected. Herein we have reviewed the findings in these cases, along with their management and outcomes. RESULTS: Moderate to severe hydronephrosis of native kidneys was observed in 14 patients, including 9 (64.3%) who had cancer including eight asymptomatic and only one with flank pain and lymph nodes metastasis succumbing in 10 months with a functioning graft. Three patients showed similar degrees of graft hydronephrosis and graft ureteral cancer was diagnosed in one. Mean time from transplantation was 5.09 years. There was a female predominance (7:3). The bladder-to-renal pelvis-to-ureter ratio was 2:5:7, which was distinct from the usual 51:3:1 distribution. In native ureter cancer, we found the left ureter more prone to develop cancer than the right (8:1). CONCLUSION: The pattern of cancer in renal transplant patients is thoroughly different from the general population, namely female predominance, with a higher incidence of ureteral and renal pelvis versus bladder cancer. In our observation, routine periodic sonography survey even in asymptomatic patients is important for urothelial tumor detection, as the incidence of cancer is surprisingly high.

Female↗

Posttransplant Kaposi's sarcoma: report from a single center.

UNLABELLED: Posttransplant Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is not uncommon. This study investigated the clinical manifestations, impact of immunosuppression, and presence of HHV-8 antigen in our patients. METHODS: Among 568 renal transplant recipients, four developed KS. The physical findings, radiologic studies, immunosuppressive regimens, and the clinical outcomes were reviewed. In two patients, the expression of human herpes virus-8 was examined with polymerase chain reaction and in situ hybridization. RESULTS: The incidence of KS was 0.7% in our recipients. The intervals between the transplantation and the development of KS ranged from 2 months to 8.4 years. All KS patients had calcineurin inhibitor-based antirejection therapies. Peripheral lymphadenopathy was the initial manifestation in three of four patients; the fourth presented with violaceous papules over his lower legs. Besides lymphadenopathy, KS in one patient also involved internal visceral organs. One patient died at the time of diagnosis because of Salmonellosis; the other three experienced tumor regression after discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitors. HHV-8 expression was detected in two examined specimens. CONCLUSION: Lymph node involvement is the most common clinical presentation in our posttransplant KS patients. HHV-8 infection is associated with the development of KS. Early withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors produces a favorable outcome in posttransplant KS.

Herpesvirus 8, Human↗

Clinical experience of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of chronic allograft nephropathy in kidney transplantation: three-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in conjunction with calcineura antagonists has been shown to prevent acute rejection in renal allograft recipients. Its role in treatment of chronic rejection or allograft nephropathy is still controversial. We initiated the study to investigate the effect of adding MMF to a cyclosporine plus prednisolone regimen in renal recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 36 patients with chronic allograft nephropathy, defined clinically as increased of serum creatinine, proteinuria, and hypertension. Renal function, cyclosporine level, renal biopsy, and renal scan were regularly done as indicated. MMF was added to 20 recipients after initial treatment with cyclosporine and prednisolone. The other 16 recipients were managed without adding MMF. Serum creatinine was monitored for 3 years. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of the patients in the two groups were comparable. The average dose of prednisolone was unchanged throughout the study and the trough level of cyclosporine was maintained in the range of 100 to 150 ng/mL. The serum creatinine decreased initially in the group on MMF, but renal function deteriorated progressively after 6 months. There was a difference in serum creatinine between the two groups but this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: MMF therapy tender to improve renal function initially but did not attenuate significantly the impairment in chronic allograft nephropathy.

Creatinine↗

De novo cancer occurrence after renal transplantation: a medical center experience in Taiwan.

INTRODUCTION: Renal transplantation has been advocated as the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. Organ transplantation increases the incidence of cancer through unclear mechanisms. A literature review showed that the most common neoplasms are of skin origin, which are uncommon in Eastern people. We reviewed cancer patterns in our renal transplant series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1981 to December 2002, among 560 renal transplantations performed in this hospital, we retrospectively surveyed cancer incidence, types, and usage of immunosuppressants. RESULTS: Twenty nine cancer cases 5.18% (incidence) included hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as the highest mortality rate (9 of 13 cases). Eight of these 13 cases were hepatitis B carriers. All four hepatitis C carriers expired three of them with unresectable multinodular tumors at diagnosis in Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) was the second most common cancer (seven cases); all but one survived with reduced doses of or changes in immunosuppressants. No skin cancer other than four Kaposi's sarcomas with skin manifestations was detected in our series. DISCUSSIONS: HCC was the main cancer in our series. Accepting hepatitis B carriers as candidates for renal recipients and donors may be one of the causes. PTLD was the second most common cancer, while there were no skin cancers.

Adult↗

Outcome of renal transplantation in children with pericardiopleural effusion.

INTRODUCTION: Children with end-stage renal disease may present with pericardiopleural effusion secondary to volume overload and overhydration. The present study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of renal transplantation in these pediatric patients. METHODS: From 1981 to 2001, six of 20 patients (30%) under 18 years old who received renal transplants showed pericardiopleural effusion after serial pretransplant imaging studies. These patients also displayed associated diseases, such as congestive heart failure (n = 3), ascites (n = 2), and splenomegaly (n = 2). The recipients included five boys and one girl of mean age of 12.7 years (range, 8 to 17 years), all of whom had undergone hemodialysis before transplantation. The waiting time for grafts ranged from 1.3 to 6 years (mean = 2.6 years). Episodes of acute pulmonary edema had been observed in three patients pretransplant. RESULTS: One recipient died with a functioning graft due to heart failure with acute pulmonary edema at 4 months after transplantation. Acute rejection episodes were observed in three, and chronic rejection in two children. The median follow-up was 11 years (range = 6 to 16 years) in the other five recipients, all of whom presently survive with functioning grafts. The posttransplant mean serum creatinine levels at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years were 1.54 +/- 0.44, 1.74 +/- 0.56, and 1.92 +/- 0.56 mg/dL, respectively. CONCLUSION: Renal transplantation in children displaying pericardiopleural effusion was associated with a high success rate. However, these patients must be followed closely with regular cardiopulmonary evaluation since their condition may deteriorate.

Adolescent↗

Does mycophenolate mofetil increase the incidence of infections in stable renal transplant recipients initially treated with a two-drug regimen?

BACKGROUND: A drug regimen including a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) and prednisone has been the mainstay of maintenance immunosuppression in our renal transplant recipients for more than 10 years. After the introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a new, potent immunosuppressant that may reduce the incidence of late rejection in renal transplant recipients, the immunosuppressive protocol in some recipients was changed to an MMF-based regimen. We sought to ascertain whether the addition of MMF lead to greater susceptibility to infectious complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 1991 and November 2002, all renal transplant recipients who received a two-drug regimen initially for more than 6 months were changed to an MMF-based regimen. The study includes patients with functional grafts for more than 6 months thereafter. Differences in the incidence, etiology, and outcome of infections were compared during the non-MMF versus the MMF periods. RESULTS: Eighty patients of mean age of 38.6 years (range 13 to 69) included 43 men and 37 women. The mean daily MMF dose was 663 mg/patient (range 250 to 1500 mg). The mean follow-up time of non-MMF period and MMF periods were 3.4 and 2.1 years, respectively. The overall incidence of infections in the two periods was similar (0.2 infections/patient in the non-MMF period and 0.25 infections/patient in the MMF period, P = .57). No mortality was associated with these infectious complications. In conclusion, addition of MMF, a more potent immunosuppressive protocol, did not increase the incidence of infections in stable renal transplant recipients initially treated with a two-drug regimen.

Bacterial Infections↗

Risks and quality-of-life changes in living kidney donors.

INTRODUCTION: Although the benefits of living donor organs for recipients are well documented, the risks and quality-of-life changes in living kidney donors are seldom reported. METHODS: From July 1992 to June 2002, all living kidney donors underwent regular follow-up at our hospital. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), a standardized questionnaire to measure quality of life, was used in this study. Furthermore, donor renal function and associate complications were assessed. RESULTS: Seventeen donors answered the questionnaire, including eight men and nine women of mean age of 41 years (range = 25 to 56). No perioperative mortality was noted. No proteinuria or hematuria was found during long-term follow-up. The mean serum creatinine level was 0.95 +/- 0.22 mg/dL before the operation. The postoperative mean serum creatinine levels at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years were 1.22 +/- 0.34, 1.19 +/- 0.20, and 1.29 +/- 0.21 mg/dL, respectively. Two cases underwent scar revision and one complained long-term wound pain for more than 1 year. One donor became depressed because of graft failure in her son. The SF-36 scores were 84.4 +/- 4.4 (physical function), 84.0 +/- 4.7 (role-physical), 78.4 +/- 8.0 (body pain), 81.5 +/- 5.9 (general health), 83.2 +/- 3.7 (vitality), 83.9 +/- 5.9 (social functioning), 79.9 +/- 4.1 (role-emotional), and 78.6 +/- 2.3 (mental health), respectively. CONCLUSION: The quality-of-life changes and risks after donation are low; most donors are concerned about cosmetic problems and pain-related scar formation.

Adult↗

Use of simulect can reduce the incidence of acute rejection and demonstrates with superior 3-year patient and graft survival rates in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection is a major cause of graft loss in renal transplantation. Because the highest risk for acute rejection is in the first month posttransplantation, improved prophylaxis could be most beneficial in this period. Simulect administration provides 30 to 45 days of immunoprophylaxis against acute rejection during the critical period after transplantation. OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the incidence of acute rejection episodes and the safety and tolerability of Simulect plus Neoral immunosuppression. Patient and graft survival rates up to 3 years posttransplantation were evaluated. METHOD: Forty-one transplant recipients received Simulect by intravenous infusion of an initial 20-mg dose on the day of renal transplantation and a second 20-mg dose on day 4 posttransplant. All renal recipients received immunosuppression with Neoral and steroid. RESULTS: There were eight cases (19.5%) of acute rejection within 1 year. The rejection episodes were easily reversed with steroid pulse therapy in seven patients except for graft loss. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year graft survival rates were 95%, 93%, and 88%, respectively. Overall, the 3-year patient survival rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Simulect in combination with Neoral and steroid-reduced the incidence of acute rejection without an increase in adverse events. The low incidence and severity of acute rejection may have led to the superior 3-year patient and graft survival rates in renal transplantation.

Adolescent↗

Sirolimus (rapamycin) reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes in renal transplantation: an initial experience in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection is the major cause of graft loss in renal transplantation. Sirolimus (rapamycin) inhibits the effects of cytokines on T and B cells; therefore, it provides prophylaxis against acute renal rejection. This open-label trial assessed the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes, variation in renal function, as well as graft and patient survival rates up to 12 months posttransplantation when using sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine and prednisolone as immunosuppressants. METHODS: Ten kidney transplant recipients received sirolimus 2 mg daily after a 6-mg loading dose. Doses were then adjusted to keep the whole-blood trough level between 5 and 20 mg/mL. All patients received sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine and prednisolone. RESULTS: At 12 months after renal transplantation, the graft and patient survival rates were 90% and 90%, respectively. One patient died at 2 months due to sepsis with a functioning graft. The mean serum creatinine levels at 1, 3, and 6 months were 1.59 mg/dL, 1.71 mg/dL, and 1.65 ml/dL, respectively. There was no biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episode within 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine and prednisolone significantly protected kidney transplant recipients from acute rejection for up to 1 year of follow-up.

Acute Disease↗

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: new combination of hand-assisted and standard approaches.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN) was conceived to decrease morbidity and reduce donor disincentives, it requires considerable experience. We present a new combination of hand-assisted and standard laparoscopic approaches to live donor nephrectomy. METHODS: Between March 2002 and February 2003, ten LLDNs were performed with the new procedures. Using the new methodology the surgeon can withdraw his hand and insert a trocar through the hand-assisted device whenever he desires. Although the hand-assisted procedure was performed in most patients, we attempted to dissect the renal hilum without hand assistance in the final patient, successfully procuring the kidney. RESULTS: Mean operation time was 245 minutes and warm ischemic time was 179 seconds. No vascular, renal parenchymal, or ureteral injuries occurred. The patient with multiple left renal arteries had a longer warm ischemic time and delayed graft function. Mean predonation creatinine was 0.97 mg/dL, it increased to 1.44 and 1.15 mg/dL at 7 days and 3 months postdonation, respectively. One patient had chylous ascites and another had a transient left brachial plexus paralysis. CONCLUSIONS: Both pure laparoscopic and hand-assisted LLDN have advantages and disadvantages. In our modification, the free conversion from hand-assisted to a purely laparoscopic approach allows the surgeon to practice two procedures simultaneously. With this combination, 90% of the LLDN were accomplished, with pure laparoscopy in the last case.

Humans↗

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in a patient with duplex inferior vena cava.

BACKGROUND: Modern imaging, such as CT and MRI, improves the preoperative assessment for variants of renal vasculature. We present a kidney donor with a duplex inferior vena cava. In conjunction with CT and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery, live donor nephrectomy was performed successfully. METHODS: A 35-year-old woman wished to donate a kidney to her son. Preoperative CT showed normal functional kidneys without uretal duplication. A duplex inferior vena cava was noted below the level of the left renal vein. A hand-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic left nephrectomy was performed. Blood loss was minimal and the warm ischemia time was 3 minutes. Renal transplantation was performed with good initial perfusion and urine output. RESULTS: The donor was discharged in good condition at 3 days postoperatively. Both donor and recipient are alive with good renal function and without late surgical complications at 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Live donor nephrectomy is unique as it involves two different patients. Benefits from laparoscopic operation include less pain, shorter hospital stay, earlier resumption of normal food intake, and earlier return to full activity. Graft function was not deleteriously affected and the survival of graft and recipient was not affected. Vascular anomalies, although uncommon, had a significant influence on live renal transplantation. Our patient represents a case of a rare venous anomaly, which has an an incidence rate of 0.5% to 3%. Helical CT with reconstruction of vascular anatomy helped in evaluating donor vasculature. In conjunction with modern imaging techniques and laparoscopic operation, live donor nephrectomy can be performed safely, even in patients with vascular anomalies.

Adolescent↗

Is sirolimus a safe alternative to reduce or eliminate calcineurin inhibitors in chronic allograft nephropathy in kidney transplantation?

PURPOSE: We evaluate whether cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (FK) could be reduced or eliminated after sirolimus was added in chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). By reducing doses of CsA or FK, we expected that renal function would improve. METHOD AND MATERIAL: Twenty-one patients with CAN had sirolimus added as an immunosuppressive agent. We evaluated the creatinine (Cr) level 3 months after addition. The doses of CsA and FK were decreased gradually and then eliminated over a course of 4 to 6 weeks. If the Cr level rose rapidly or other prominent signs of rejection occurred; low-dose CsA or FK would be added per protocol. We evaluated the duration of engraftment before sirolimus and the Cr level when it was added. RESULTS: Renal function improved in 13 of 21 cases. The improvement in Cr ranged from 12.5% maximally to 1.84% minimally. Seven of 13 cases still required low-dose CsA. The average duration of engraftment before sirolimus was 13.66 +/- 10.80 months. The average Cr level before sirolimus was 1.65 +/- 0.56 mg/dL. In the other eight cases, the Cr level kept rising from 5.1% to 20.4%. The average duration of engraftment was 88.38 +/- 42.21 months. The average Cr level before sirolimus was 2.85 +/- 0.54 mg/dL. Hyperuricemia was noted in 31.3% and hyperlipidemia in 68.8%. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus is a safe alternative to reduce or eliminate CsA or FK in CAN. In cases with a long duration of engraftment and high Cr level, sirolimus might have some effect as a substitute for CNI and thus prevent further nephrotoxicity.

Chronic Disease↗