Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Y Collan

Publications and source records attributed to Y Collan.

224 records · Page 13Linked to original sources

Immunohistochemical staining of human breast cancer with a new tumour marker MCA: relation to axillary lymph node involvement, metastasis, and survival.

The immunohistochemical reactivity of a new tumour marker MCA (mucinous carcinoma associated antigen) was determined in human breast cancer. The material consisted of paraffin-embedded biopsies from the breast tumours in 95 patients. The age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 58.1 +/- 13.1 years. The maximal follow-up time was 13.3 years and the mean follow-up time 12.4 years (range 11.5-13.3 years). MCA positivity was not related to histological type or size of the tumour. It was, however, related to axillary node involvement (p = 0.05) and metastasis (p = 0.06) during the follow-up time. The prediction of metastasis (p = 0.05) and node involvement (p = 0.048) was better in postmenopausal women. Crude survival or breast cancer survival could not be predicted with statistical significance on the basis of MCA staining. The disease-free survival had an almost statistically significant correlation with MCA positivity (p = 0.09). Our results suggest that the new tumour marker antigen MCA reacts with breast cancer cells in paraffin sections. It might be used in identification of cancer cells in tissue sections. MCA can also be used as a weak indicator of aggressiveness of the tumour.

Antigens, Neoplasm↗

Efficient test for cancer antigens: decreased levels of cancer antigen in serum after excision of breast tumor.

Monoclonal antibody technology has developed new serum marker tests which may offer advantages in the follow up of cancer patients. In breast cancer detection among symptomatic patients MCA and CA 15-3 monoclonals at best reach a sensitivity of about 0.45 at a specificity level of 0.90. We have tested these monoclonal tests (MCA and CA 15-3) by applying them to detect the postoperative decrease of marker levels in the serum among women with breast cancer or benign breast disease. The CA 15-3 postoperative decrease test (5% decrease) reached slightly higher diagnostic sensitivity (0.70) and efficiency (0.83) than the MCA postoperative decrease test (sensitivity 0.65, efficiency 0.80). The combined MCA and CA 15-3 decrease tests had a sensitivity of 0.85 and an efficiency of 0.90 at 5% decrease level. The postoperative decrease test is far superior to normal marker tests in breast cancer detection, especially when several sensitive markers are used. A 35% or larger decrease in serum levels of MCA or CA 15-3 after surgery was 100% specific for breast cancer, and detected 43% of all cancer cases. Although such a test cannot be used for screening, it could be valuable in special diagnostic situations.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

A new tumor marker MCA in breast cancer diagnosis.

The serum concentration of the new tumor marker MCA (mucinous carcinoma associated antigen) was determined by an enzyme immunoassay kit method, which is based on the use of a monoclonal antibody b12. The mean MCA values in breast cancer patients (n = 40) were significantly higher than in patients with benign breast disease (n = 55, p less than 0.001) and in control subjects (n = 37, p less than 0.001). When we used the cut-off level 11 KU/l for MCA, 6/37 (16.2%) of control subjects 7/55 (12.7%) of patients with benign breast disease, 18/40 (45.0%) of all breast cancer patients 11/19 (57.9%) of breast cancer patients with axillary node involvement, and 1/1 breast cancer patient with distant metastases were above this cut-off level. For comparison, at the cut-off level of 5 micrograms/l the CEA test was positive in 7/40 (18%) cancer cases, and in 6/19 (32%) of cancer patients with nodal involvement. Patients with axillary nodal metastasis showed higher values than patients without metastasis in both tests (p less than 0.01). The combination of MCA at 11 KU/l cut-off level and CEA at the 5.0 micrograms/l cut-off level reached the diagnostic sensitivity of 0.53, efficiency of 0.73, and specificity of 0.87. It seems that MCA is a promising tumor marker in breast cancer. Especially high values may have diagnostic significance.

Adult↗

Estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer: relationships to tumour histopathology and survival of patients.

Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) concentrations were measured in the tumours of 399 cases of primary breast carcinoma. Histological type and histological grading was also analysed. The correlation between survival and histological grading was observed and found to be of high significance statistically. Longer survival of patients with ER- and/or PR-positive tumours was also observed, but the ER and PR prognostic value did not reach the same magnitude as histological alone. The prognostic accuracy in breast cancer, when histological grading, ER and PR were used together, failed to reach statistically significant values. A lower proportion of ER- and PR-positive tumours were found in histological grade III. The majority of the tumours belonging to specific histological variants of carcinoma were ER- and/or PR-positive. Relationships between ER, PR, menopausal status, and age were also noted. It was apparent that the prognostic value of PR concentrations in the tumour was more relevant than that of ER alone.

Adult↗

Prediction of survival in breast cancer: evaluation of different multivariate models.

BACKGROUND: We compared the performance of multivariate models based on mitotic activity index, lymph node status, and tumor size in the prognostication of breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cox and discriminant models for survival were created for two patient groups: a) 120 breast cancer patients, and b) 86 patients with ductal infiltrating carcinoma. The models were compared with the model of Baak et al (1985). RESULTS: The models distinguished between dying and surviving patients with an efficiency of 70.9-77.9% in mutual tests. With a single cutoff the model of Baak et al was less efficient (50.8-65.8%). If a region of uncertainty was allowed between two cutpoints, the efficiencies below and above the cutpoints increased. When the uncertain region included a third of the patients, the efficiency varied between 73.8 and 84.7%. CONCLUSION: Multivariate models seem to need a region of uncertainty between two discriminating cutpoints. These models resulted in the correct prediction of prognosis in about 75% and more of patients. With different materials the models differed in efficiency. With a region of uncertainty the model of Baak et al performed well with completely independent material.

Adult↗